On 11/19/2012 07:18 AM, Michael Monnerie wrote:
[crosspost postfix-users and spamassassin-users]
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 14:08:08 schrieb Michael Monnerie:
How should we report those IPs, is there a "anti botnet unit"
somewhere?
Lets concentrate back on the subject, I got this answer:
[crosspost postfix-users and spamassassin-users]
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2012, 14:08:08 schrieb Michael Monnerie:
> How should we report those IPs, is there a "anti botnet unit"
> somewhere?
Lets concentrate back on the subject, I got this answer:
> normally it makes no sense to report botnets
Thank you Jari,
> > In the same way, I am wondering if something similar exists for all
> > the (open|libre|MS)office documents?
> ExtractText
>
> Works with this documents as well as with PDF.
I had a look at ExtractText, but it only extract text,not the images.
And antiword, the extractor for
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:07:39 -0500
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 11/18, RW wrote:
> > Whilst that wont hurt, it's not the real cause of the problem here
> > which rests entirely with UnifiedeMail.net.
> >
> > Whilst it would have prevented this FP, authentication is intended
> > to solve a d
Le 15/11/2012 22:16, Per-Erik Persson a écrit :
>
> Is there a way to add spamassin rules without editing the config
> and reloading the process?
>
> To be more specific, I can set up a RBL of my own and add
> suspicious servers found in the header, no problems to do that.
> This can be done tod
On 11/18, RW wrote:
> Whilst that wont hurt, it's not the real cause of the problem here which
> rests entirely with UnifiedeMail.net.
>
> Whilst it would have prevented this FP, authentication is intended to
> solve a different problem. It shouldn't be necessary to have a
> workaround for the int
Am 18.11.2012 19:35, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 18.11.2012 14:08, schrieb Michael Monnerie:
>> We've got one users e-mail password hacked, and at the sime time a lot
>> of different IPs started to use that address. Here is the list. How
>> should we report those IPs, is there a "anti botnet
Am 18.11.2012 14:08, schrieb Michael Monnerie:
> We've got one users e-mail password hacked, and at the sime time a lot
> of different IPs started to use that address. Here is the list. How
> should we report those IPs, is there a "anti botnet unit" somewhere?
> What is the best way to fight it?
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:09:11 -0800 (PST)
umeca74 wrote:
> > Is 1and1.co.uk in the trusted hosts?
ContentAnalysis[at]UnifiedeMail.net is an address you can send an email
to and get back a SpamAssassin report on that email.
> >Received: from hppro (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr
> >[94.68.74.19
On 11/17, umeca74 wrote:
> >Received: from hppro (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr [94.68.74.194])
> > by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
> >
> > I believe if that said "ESMTPA" instead of "ESMTP",
> > you would not have that problem
>
> are you sure? I will report i
We've got one users e-mail password hacked, and at the sime time a lot
of different IPs started to use that address. Here is the list. How
should we report those IPs, is there a "anti botnet unit" somewhere?
What is the best way to fight it?
008.021.006.226
014.139.187.017
014.149.118.062
014.1
11 matches
Mail list logo
