On 11/18, RW wrote: > Whilst that wont hurt, it's not the real cause of the problem here which > rests entirely with UnifiedeMail.net. > > Whilst it would have prevented this FP, authentication is intended to > solve a different problem. It shouldn't be necessary to have a > workaround for the internal network being needlessly allowed to bleed > into a remote private network. > > I wouldn't worry too much about this, it's not a general problem.
I disagree. I think indicating the authentication is a better option than chopping off the early received header(s). -- "I'd rather be happy than right any day." - Slartiblartfast, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy http://www.ChaosReigns.com
