Re: Still no apparent fix on ipv6 spamd?

2012-09-25 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 9/25/2012 5:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago. I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make spamd listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor is there

Re: HTML link regex

2012-09-25 Thread John Hardin
Please keep the discussion on-list so others may benefit or make suggestions, thanks. On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Alexandre Boyer wrote: I totaly agree. I think that the HTML parser could easily handle this. To the best of my knowledge, there is no modifier (like :addr or :name for From header ch

Re: Still no apparent fix on ipv6 spamd?

2012-09-25 Thread Greg Troxel
"David F. Skoll" writes: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:02:14 -0700 (PDT) > "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" wrote: > >> This means that if you want to listen on v6, none of your v4 clients >> can connect. > > I think this is a FreeBSDism. On Linux, something listening on > :: will answer both IPv4 and I

Re: HTML link regex

2012-09-25 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Alexandre Boyer wrote: It's essentially FREEMAIL_FROM and the body only contains a fake Youtube link like: http://www.probono.fr/95280_pdf";>http://www.youtube.com/wa= tch?v=3D3VvOFqaHbL5&feature=3Dg-vrec&feature=3Dg-vrec This topic comes up regularly enough that it

Re: Still no apparent fix on ipv6 spamd?

2012-09-25 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 9/25/2012 5:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago. I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make spamd listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor is there

Re: Still no apparent fix on ipv6 spamd?

2012-09-25 Thread David F. Skoll
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:02:14 -0700 (PDT) "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" wrote: > This means that if you want to listen on v6, none of your v4 clients > can connect. I think this is a FreeBSDism. On Linux, something listening on :: will answer both IPv4 and IPv6 connection attempts. Maybe FreeBSD

Re: Still no apparent fix on ipv6 spamd?

2012-09-25 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 9/25/2012 5:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago. I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make spamd listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor is there a way to listen on multiple addresses with mul

Still no apparent fix on ipv6 spamd?

2012-09-25 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
All, I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago. I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make spamd listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor is there a way to listen on multiple addresses with multiple -A options. This means that if you want to

HTML link regex

2012-09-25 Thread Alexandre Boyer
Hi list, I'm receiving a lot of spam of a very particular sort. It's essentially FREEMAIL_FROM and the body only contains a fake Youtube link like: http://www.probono.fr/95280_pdf";>http://www.youtube.com/wa= tch?v=3D3VvOFqaHbL5&feature=3Dg-vrec&feature=3Dg-vrec I ended with a regex fo