On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/25/2012 5:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago.
I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make spamd
listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor is there a way to
listen on multiple addresses with multiple -A options.
This means that if you want to listen on v6, none of your v4 clients can
connect.
I also note that like all standard resolver libraries, if you specify a
hostname to spamc, it tries the v6 variant first -- so the default
behaviors between spamc and spamd are still conflicting. Nor is there an
option in spamc to say "use this hostname, but only try v4".
Has anyone come up with patches for the above, or is the solution really to
just hard-code the ipv4 address everywhere when doing a remote-connect (or
perhaps define alternate v4-only hostnames for your spamd hosts).
Hi Dan!
I'm working on packaging an RC for 3.4.0 and ipv6 is a big focus of this
release. Can you open a bug about these issues with as much information as
you can, please?
You got it. Later today, probably. Do you prefer one bug or multiple
(there's at least four or five issues in this)?
-Dan
--
Pika Pika Pika!
-Pikachu, of Pokemon fame.
--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------
