Re: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham

2012-03-07 Thread RW
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:35:05 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 05.03.12 12:15, RW wrote: > >I don't like it. It relies on FPs being removed from the SPAM folder > >rather than spam being sent to a learn-spam folder. > > Pardon me, but: > > Usage for end users > > *move mail into SPA

Re: Sought rules alive?

2012-03-07 Thread darxus
On 03/07, Andrea gabellini - SC wrote: > I noticed that sought rules are not updated from many weeks? > > Is the project alive? There was no mention of intentionally killing it off, so my guess is it accidentally broke and wasn't noticed. It hasn't been updated since 2012-01-02, and is supposed

Re : Sought rules alive?

2012-03-07 Thread Leveau Stanislas
Hi I have the same problem but no idea Regards Stan Le 07/03/12, Andrea gabellini - SC a écrit : > Hello, > > I noticed that sought rules are not updated from many weeks? > > Is the project alive? > > Thanks, > Andrea > >

Re: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham

2012-03-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 04.03.12 14:02, RW wrote: >An alternative would be to be more selective. I'm not sure if this is >specific to dovecot but when I copy/move a file in IMAP the new >maildir file has the same mtime, but a new epoch time in the file >name. What you might do is generate a list of filenames that co

Sought rules alive?

2012-03-07 Thread Andrea gabellini - SC
Hello, I noticed that sought rules are not updated from many weeks? Is the project alive? Thanks, Andrea