On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:35:05 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 05.03.12 12:15, RW wrote: > >I don't like it. It relies on FPs being removed from the SPAM folder > >rather than spam being sent to a learn-spam folder. > > Pardon me, but: > > Usage for end users > > *move mail into SPAM folder to classify as spam > *move mail out of SPAM folder to classify as not spam > > isn't the former what you want? I'm more concerned about what happens to the mail that isn't moved. I think positive training is better than supervised autolearning The scheme might work well for pure train-on-error, but that's not really practical on Spamassassin where the classification is distinct from the Bayes result.
