On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:17:34 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > But most of the time, there are 6-8 children running.
> >
> >> ...to answer my own question, max-spare overrides it?
> >
> > Hm, I wondered if that might be the case.
>
> Can't see what els
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, John Hardin wrote:
> You posted this command line:
>
> /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -x -q -r /var/run/spamd.pid --min-children=59
> --min-spare=1 --max-spare=1 --max-conn-per-child=100 -m 60 -s local1
> -u spamd -
Axb wrote:
total shot in the dark:
Do you use Bayes autoexpire?
a long autoexpire job during highish load can do weird things.
No, daily cron expiry since shortly after I started using a global
Bayes with 2.5. In the current incarnation a short script does sa-learn
--force-expire along with
On 01/31/2012 10:30 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
OTOH... I'm having trouble seeing where this could cause the whole spamd
process tree to lock up completely for ~15 minutes. (It locks hard
enough that a monitoring process gets "connection timed out", even
though there are only 5 spamd children running
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, John Hardin wrote:
You posted this command line:
/usr/local/bin/spamd -d -x -q -r /var/run/spamd.pid --min-children=59
--min-spare=1 --max-spare=1 --max-conn-per-child=100 -m 60 -s local1
-u spamd --timeout-child=60 -i 0.0.0.0 -A --syslog-ident
spamd/mai
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:
RW wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:04:58 -0500
> Kris Deugau wrote:
>
> > 23:23:32 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
> > 23:23:34 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
> > 2
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:04:58 -0500
Kris Deugau wrote:
> 23:23:32 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
> 23:23:34 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
> 23:23:35 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
>
- Original Message -
> On 1/11/2012 5:10 PM, David B Funk wrote:
> > Problem with all those methods is that they're reactive, will not
> > hit
> > until -after- somebody has seen the bad crap and created filers,
> > RBL-lists, taught Bayes, etc.
> >
> > The OP explicitly said that the first
RW wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:04:58 -0500
Kris Deugau wrote:
23:23:32 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
23:23:34 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
23:23:35 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
23:39:20 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states
