RW wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:04:58 -0500
Kris Deugau wrote:

23:23:32 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
23:23:34 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
23:23:35 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BI
23:39:20 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BB
23:39:20 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BBB
23:39:20 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BBBB
23:39:20 mfs2 spamd/main[26981]: prefork: child states: BBBBB


This doesn't look anything like the spamd options you
quoted. Suspiciously 5 is the default for max-children, and it's
consistent with the defaults for min-spare and max-spare too.

I should have added a "...." on the bottom of that list; I didn't think it useful to show the full progression up to the defined max_children setting of 60 (which it usually reaches within a second or two). spamd is behaving properly at that point and chewing through mail as fast as a child process can grab some CPU.

-kgd

Reply via email to