>> I am the ports maintainer for the FreeBSD version of SpamAssassin.
>>
>> used 'it' for YEARS in production, (commercial product,) several
>> platforms, i386, amd64, FreeBSD versions 6.4-7.4.
>>
>> ONE DAY, ONE BRAND NEW CLIENT was having real problems with their mailq.
> email
>> wa
>> while I*DO* appreciate your suggestion, since I am fairly confident to say
>> I doubt that my config is the problem in a DNS resolver/IPv6 function
>> redefinition, I'm not too interested in proving that point by making
>> those
>> changes on a production machine. Again, thanks anyway.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, AJ Weber wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
The thread subject is "Short body rules" on 11/25/2011
Thanks for the pointer. Using the "Old Nabble1" website, there are ZERO
threads/emails archived for 11/25/11. :(
When I get some time, I'll see where the other archives are for th
John Hardin wrote:
>
> The thread subject is "Short body rules" on 11/25/2011
>
Thanks for the pointer. Using the "Old Nabble1" website, there are ZERO
threads/emails archived for 11/25/11. :(
When I get some time, I'll see where the other archives are for this list
and search there. Thank
> Please don't top-post.
Sorry. Even though I subscribed, and sent the "confirmation" email, I still
don't get any of the messages in my email, so I'm posting via the "Old
Nabble" web form. That doesn't allow me to automate indenting/quoting
previous messages, so I will manually put >'s in fro
On 1/7/12 1:56 PM, email builder wrote:
while I*DO* appreciate your suggestion, since I am fairly confident to say I
doubt that my config is the problem in a DNS resolver/IPv6 function
redefinition, I'm not too interested in proving that point by making those
changes on a production machine. Ag
