> Please don't top-post.
Sorry. Even though I subscribed, and sent the "confirmation" email, I still don't get any of the messages in my email, so I'm posting via the "Old Nabble" web form. That doesn't allow me to automate indenting/quoting previous messages, so I will manually put >'s in front of all the lines if you want. >Body tests are run per paragraph, so you would need one of then to >have 100 chars. Wow. I would've thought I would have run across this info in all the searching I've done about rules and custom rules. Good to know, thanks. >Also they are just run on just the text that the reader >would see, if that matters to you. If you are intending to give this a >significant score, then it seems a bit reckless to me. Do you never >receive terse emails? I sometimes receive terse emails, but very rarely to the accounts I'm trying to protect with SA. Since no spam filter is 100%, this just seems to be a rule that I could use, with an appropriate score. >If you are new to SA I would suggest you start with making sure that >Bayes is properly trained, and you have have the infrastructure to >keep it trained without much effort. Razor DCC etc are fairly minor >components compared to BAYES. I can train Bayes, but keeping it trained might be a bit of effort for the install size I'm dealing with (small). Since this is a combination of work- and non-work mailboxes, the breadth of email types that the users would consider ham is probably not going to make Bayes training very accurate, but I would love to be wrong. Thanks for the reply. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/rule-to-test-%22body%22-length--tp33092865p33104550.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
