On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:32 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
> earthlink.net net is a spam source since years ( not one of the worst )
Indeed, they have been listed on no less than 27 times over my career
here. AOL and twtelecom only got listed 17 times :-)
in fact they now are relisted on on
On 10/14/2011 12:05 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> OK - I didn't deliberately blacklist them. I found a bug in my yellow
> listing code
No system or person or group of people is perfect and we ALL make
mistakes... even big mistakes from time to time... and even large and
famous corporations make big mis
On 10/13/2011 2:33 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 14:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/13, jdow wrote:
3.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK
[207.69.195.183 listed in
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
None of the blacklists, or software
On 10/13/2011 2:15 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/13, jdow wrote:
3.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK
[207.69.195.183 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
None of the blacklists, or software involved, are maintained by perfect
On 10/13/2011 2:04 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 07:26, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/13/2011 1:16 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
On 13/10/2011 10:07, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp s
On 10/13/2011 2:00 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 07:21, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/12/2011 12:49 PM, jdow wrote:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into
their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail
marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 18:23 -0700, jdow wrote:
> You mean like
> ===8<---
> :0c:
> $HOME/mail/rawmbox
> ===8<--- {^_-}
>
I'm not really up to speed on procmail, but I guess so.
> What that trick needs is a way to pull a log rotate sort of function on the
> rawmbox.
>
I cheated there: rather than
On 2011/10/13 16:31, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:56 -0700, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 05:43, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 04:50 -0700, jdow wrote:
Thank you, sir. I'll check [getmail] out. RPM Forge has a suitable
package for SL6.1.
Look at your distro's r
> On 9/28/2011 8:02 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>> You definitely have a good point that it would only be necessary to
>> track the combinations that actually show up in emails, however
>> 1024 is only the possible combinations from one set of 10 rules.
>> The number of combinations in the ac
On 13/10/2011 9:01 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 03:57 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 13/10/2011 1:45 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
In a related note, as per the M::SA::Conf docs for meta rules -- "The
value of a hit meta test is that of its arithmetic expression. Th
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 03:57 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> On 13/10/2011 1:45 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > In a related note, as per the M::SA::Conf docs for meta rules -- "The
> > value of a hit meta test is that of its arithmetic expression. The value
> > of a hit eval test is that retu
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:56 -0700, jdow wrote:
> On 2011/10/13 05:43, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 04:50 -0700, jdow wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you, sir. I'll check [getmail] out. RPM Forge has a suitable
> >> package for SL6.1.
> >>
> > Look at your distro's repo first: its a Fedora
On 2011/10/13 14:15, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/13, jdow wrote:
3.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK
[207.69.195.183 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
None of the blacklists, or software involved, are maintained by perfect
be
On 10/13, jdow wrote:
> 3.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK
> [207.69.195.183 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
None of the blacklists, or software involved, are maintained by perfect
beings. And you get it all for free. Mistakes happen,
On 2011/10/13 08:18, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/12/2011 12:49 PM, jdow wrote:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
If by some mistake we actually did bla
On 2011/10/13 07:26, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/13/2011 1:16 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
On 13/10/2011 10:07, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
list. So I am optin
On 2011/10/13 07:24, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/13/2011 12:32 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
On 2011/10/13 07:21, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/12/2011 12:49 PM, jdow wrote:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
Excuse me!
Earthlink servers are NOT
On 2011/10/13 05:54, RW wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:45:18 -0700
jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/12 16:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:49:12 -0700, jdow wrote:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers
into their list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL
On 2011/10/13 05:44, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:45:18 -0700, jdow wrote:
what are stopping you from add there ip to trusted_networks ?
A bug I reported several years ago between fetchmail and SpamAssassin.
hmp, spamassassin still can excempt whitelisted/blacklisted ips, if y
On 2011/10/13 05:43, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 04:50 -0700, jdow wrote:
Thank you, sir. I'll check [getmail] out. RPM Forge has a suitable
package for SL6.1.
Look at your distro's repo first: its a Fedora supported package, so I'd
expect other distros to include it too.
I
On 10/12/2011 12:49 PM, jdow wrote:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into
their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail
marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
If by some mistake we actually did blacklist an earthlink.net server
then I
On 10/11/2011 6:49 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 7 Oct 2011 00:28:49 -, John Levine wrote:
Nobody with any interest in delivering the mail that their users want.
The error rate is much, much too high.
On 10/7/2011 12:50 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
how ?
On 10.10.11 07:00, Marc P
On 10/10/2011 9:16 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/10, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 9/28/2011 8:02 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 09/28, Marc Perkel wrote:
You would only have to test the rule combinations that the message
actually triggered. So if it hit 10 rules then it would be 102
On 10/13/2011 1:16 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
On 13/10/2011 10:07, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers
into their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received
On 10/13/2011 12:32 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
earthlink.net net is a spam sourc
On 10/12/2011 12:49 PM, jdow wrote:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into
their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail
marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
Excuse me!
Earthlink servers are NOT blacklisted.
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Su
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:45:18 -0700
jdow wrote:
> On 2011/10/12 16:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:49:12 -0700, jdow wrote:
> >> The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers
> >> into their list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my
> >> received mai
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:45:18 -0700, jdow wrote:
what are stopping you from add there ip to trusted_networks ?
A bug I reported several years ago between fetchmail and
SpamAssassin.
hmp, spamassassin still can excempt whitelisted/blacklisted ips, if you
want it to, it does not count how you fe
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 04:50 -0700, jdow wrote:
> Thank you, sir. I'll check [getmail] out. RPM Forge has a suitable
> package for SL6.1.
>
Look at your distro's repo first: its a Fedora supported package, so I'd
expect other distros to include it too.
The following is not to tell you what you al
On 2011/10/13 03:44, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:45 -0700, jdow wrote:
A bug I reported several years ago between fetchmail and SpamAssassin.
Minor point: fetchmail is known to be buggy, amongst which is a bad
habit of leaving previously read mail in the source mailbox, whe
On 2011/10/13 01:17, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 13.10.2011 10:07, schrieb jdow:
On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into
their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my recei
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:45 -0700, jdow wrote:
> A bug I reported several years ago between fetchmail and SpamAssassin.
>
Minor point: fetchmail is known to be buggy, amongst which is a bad
habit of leaving previously read mail in the source mailbox, where it
remains forever or until you take spec
Am 13.10.2011 10:07, schrieb jdow:
> On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
>>> The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into
>>> their
>>> list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail
>>> marked as
>>> spam.
>
On 13/10/2011 10:07, jdow wrote:
On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into
their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail
marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
It
On 2011/10/13 00:32, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
earthlink.net net is a spam source si
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
> The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
> list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail marked as
> spam.
>
> Damn fools.
> {+_+}
earthlink.net net is a spam source since years ( not one of the worst )
the
37 matches
Mail list logo
