On 2011/10/13 07:24, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 10/13/2011 12:32 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 21:49, schrieb jdow:
The idiots who run that one have put the Earthlink smtp servers into their
list. So I am opting out of it. I don't want ALL my received mail marked as
spam.
Damn fools.
{+_+}
earthlink.net net is a spam source since years ( not one of the worst )
the only thing what makes suprise that they got in rbls at present
but however, nothing in the world is perfect
also in case of rbl using, so its up to postmaster to get free from the
list, nothing what you should flame about, anyway whitelisting is
(should be ) possible ever, at your site and on other sites
Except the premise is not true. We do not list earthlink.net in our blacklist.
Eathlinks servers are yellow listed indicating that they are a mixed source of
email and the IP address means nothing.
Since you are (perhaps justifiably being repetitious) I will be, too.
3.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK
[207.69.195.26 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
3.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK
[207.69.195.183 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
This is the latter one.
Received: from mx-taint.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.183])
by mdl-compact.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP
id 1rdHIL1Ry3Nl37e0; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
A reverse DNS on the address confirms it. This was killing LKML, Scientific
Linux users list, and other almost 100% good sources.
And so forth.
Care to try again?
{^_^}
Somehow it got listed. It MAY be unlisted now. I don't see anything hitting
the residual score 0.001 I left dangling around as a check.
{^_^}
