I'm setting up the spam/virus filtering on an Apache James mail server, and
SpamAssassin is one of the pieces we plan on using. I used to run a
Sendmail-based server with SpamAssassin for years at a previous job, so I'm
familiar with SA, but I'm still new to James.
James includes a plugin for B
On 07/28, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Daniel McDonald wrote:
> >I see a lot of messages hitting RP_MATCHES_RCVD that also hits one of the
> >Invaluement rbls. Invaluement primarily targets snowshoe spammers.
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110727-r1151385-n/RP_MATCHES_RCVD/detail
On 7/28/11 11:47 AM, "John Hardin" wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Daniel McDonald wrote:
>
>> I see a lot of messages hitting RP_MATCHES_RCVD that also hits one of the
>> Invaluement rbls. Invaluement primarily targets snowshoe spammers.
>>
>> $ grep RP_MATCHES_RCVD /var/log/mail/info.log | gr
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Daniel McDonald wrote:
I see a lot of messages hitting RP_MATCHES_RCVD that also hits one of the
Invaluement rbls. Invaluement primarily targets snowshoe spammers.
$ grep RP_MATCHES_RCVD /var/log/mail/info.log | grep -vc INVL
41618
$ grep RP_MATCHES_RCVD /var/log/mail/info
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:28:37 +0100, RW wrote:
There seems to be a consensus that SPF and DKIM passes aren't worth
significant scores. So how is it that RP_MATCHES_RCVD, scores -1.2
when
it just a circumstantial version of what SPF does explicitly.
For me it's hitting more spam that ham, and wh
On 7/28/11 9:48 AM, "Mike Grau" wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 09:28 AM the voices made RW write:
>> There seems to be a consensus that SPF and DKIM passes aren't worth
>> significant scores. So how is it that RP_MATCHES_RCVD, scores -1.2 when
>> it just a circumstantial version of what SPF does expli
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:45:35 +0200, Axb wrote:
Jul 28 11:38:52.060 [16462] dbg: dns: 1.3.3.sought.rules.yerp.org =>
3301151446, parsed as 3301151446
Let's ask JM to add:
Facebook |
Twitter |
to his "kill_bad_patterns"
are this a problem with dkim testing ?
what if JM add this skip words
On 07/28/2011 09:28 AM the voices made RW write:
There seems to be a consensus that SPF and DKIM passes aren't worth
significant scores. So how is it that RP_MATCHES_RCVD, scores -1.2 when
it just a circumstantial version of what SPF does explicitly.
For me it's hitting more spam that ham, and w
On 28/07/11 15:28, RW wrote:
There seems to be a consensus that SPF and DKIM passes aren't worth
significant scores. So how is it that RP_MATCHES_RCVD, scores -1.2 when
it just a circumstantial version of what SPF does explicitly.
For me it's hitting more spam that ham, and what's worse, it's mo
There seems to be a consensus that SPF and DKIM passes aren't worth
significant scores. So how is it that RP_MATCHES_RCVD, scores -1.2 when
it just a circumstantial version of what SPF does explicitly.
For me it's hitting more spam that ham, and what's worse, it's mostly
hitting low-scoring freema
On 27-07-2011 19:01, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 07/27, Bruno Ferreira - Digitalmente Lda. wrote:
always self-addressed in some form or other) are actually being
delivered without any SA headers after all. However, the logs (the
Is it possible plesk is set up to only add the SA headers ab
Jason,
> Yes I have 3.3.2 so I've made that change as it seems to make a lot of
> sense to me.
>
> However, I think that will just slow down the rate of learns and it will
> still snarl up at busy times?
True.
I don't have a better answer for your original question on a slowdown.
There may be s
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:30:33AM +, Jason Ede wrote:
> Even with auto_expiry off the system is still running really slow for a
> remote server... The local server bayes updates go through really quickly,
> but the remote servers queries are still backing up...
>
> i.e. from slow query log
On 2011-07-28 12:39, Ned Slider wrote:
Hi,
JM_SOUGHT_3 is hitting Facebook notifications again.
The offending rule appears to be:
body __SEEK_2GW7AI
/\. If you don\'t want to receive these emails from Facebook in the
future or have your email address used for friend suggestions, you can
unsub
Hi,
JM_SOUGHT_3 is hitting Facebook notifications again.
The offending rule appears to be:
body __SEEK_2GW7AI
/\. If you don\'t want to receive these emails from Facebook in the
future or have your email address used for friend suggestions, you can
unsubscribe\. /
Channel update was:
Jul
Hi,
Yes I have 3.3.2 so I've made that change as it seems to make a lot of sense to
me.
However, I think that will just slow down the rate of learns and it will still
snarl up at busy times?
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si]
> Sent: 28
On Thursday July 28 2011 11:30:33 Jason Ede wrote:
> Even with auto_expiry off the system is still running really slow for a
> remote server... The local server bayes updates go through really quickly,
> but the remote servers queries are still backing up...
>
> i.e. from slow query log just now..
Even with auto_expiry off the system is still running really slow for a remote
server... The local server bayes updates go through really quickly, but the
remote servers queries are still backing up...
i.e. from slow query log just now...
# User@Host: sa_user[sa_user] @ gateway.XXX.XXX [XXX.XXX
18 matches
Mail list logo
