I'm setting up the spam/virus filtering on an Apache James mail server, and SpamAssassin is one of the pieces we plan on using. I used to run a Sendmail-based server with SpamAssassin for years at a previous job, so I'm familiar with SA, but I'm still new to James.
James includes a plugin for Bayesian spam filtering. So far, the main advantage I see for it is that it includes a system to train the filter by forwarding attachments. Does anyone here have experience with *both* James's Bayesian filter and SA's? If so, would you recommend: 1. Sticking with SA's Bayesian filter? 2. Running SpamAssassin without Bayes, then James' BayesianAnalysis mailet? 3. Running James's BayesianAnalysis mailet first, then SpamAssassin without Bayes? In case it makes a difference, we're running James 2.3 with the SpamAssassin mailet backported from 3.0, and we'll be using a sitewide database (at least to begin with). Thanks in advance, Kelson Vibber TollFreeForwarding.com, Development
