5.5.2011 9:40, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
> 5.5.2011 5:01, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti:
>> On 05/05, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>> http: GET
>>> http://rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com/rules/stage/3301099614.tar.gz
>>> request failed: 404 Not Found: >
>> I have no problem downloading that link.
5.5.2011 5:01, dar...@chaosreigns.com kirjoitti:
> On 05/05, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> http: GET
>> http://rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com/rules/stage/3301099614.tar.gz
>> request failed: 404 Not Found:
> I have no problem downloading that link. If you figure out what the
> problem is, I'd be c
Hi,
I will answer my question.
The problem was SARE rules. After removing all SARE related rules, the
problem was solved.
Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Ibrahim Harrani
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running SA 3.3.1 on FreeBSD 8 amd64
> Some of the child process use %100 CPU. When I check the
Hello,
yesterday I noticed a DSN my mailer send back was rejected as spam.
I found that SA-Rules FRT_SOMA and URI_HEX matches but I don't
find why ??
here is my postfix queuefile I sent
and the quarantined file amavisd saved for this investigation:
http://andreasschulze.de/tmp/queuefile
http://
On 05/05, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> http: GET
> http://rules.yerp.org.s3.amazonaws.com/rules/stage/3301099614.tar.gz
> request failed: 404 Not Found: http://www.ChaosReigns.com
4.5.2011 23:12, Bowie Bailey kirjoitti:
> On 5/2/2011 4:44 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> That sa-update channel fails, and no file can be found.
>>
>> Is this temporary problem or what has happened? It has been a failure
>> many days now.
>
> Looks like it is you (or your network path) rather tha
I've been thinking about using bayes in learning mode, but I want to
do it without disturbing my current mail setup.
I thought I might (using procmail) channel a copy of all incoming mail
through spamassassin with bayes learning turned on.
I'd want bayes learning off in the main mail setup. So
On 5/2/2011 4:44 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> That sa-update channel fails, and no file can be found.
>
> Is this temporary problem or what has happened? It has been a failure
> many days now.
Looks like it is you (or your network path) rather than the server. I
looked through my logs and I have
On 05/04, smallrat wrote:
> I already solved that problem. It was really in the memory. So thanks for
> help.
How did you solve it?
It's probably appropriate (and more productive) to post any questions
about mass-check to the dev list.
Will you be sharing your new rules with us?
--
"If you wa
Hi,
I would like to know, if there is any possibility to reuse scores assigned
to those (online) rule hits in previous spamassassin check (obtained with
the --reuse param.). My problem is, that I don't have any internet access
with my virtual machine (I can't have one) and I want to test new rule
John Hardin wrote:
>
>> The last thing it wrote was an report "Plugin eval failed" and I have
>> read
>> somewhere, that it could be caused by insufficient RAM size. Could it be
>> also my case?
>> I actually run that computer only as virtual machine with 512 MB of ram,
>> so
>> I supose it can
11 matches
Mail list logo