On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, [UTF-8] Marcin Miros�^Baw wrote:
> W dniu 07.03.2011 13:40, Michelle Konzack pisze:
> > Hello,
> >
> > since 2011-01-19 I have a problem because my FTTH was accidently cuted
> > and now no one want ot be responsable including my ISP.
> >
> > OK, <88.168.69.36> had an rDNS to
> I also have some thoughts about discarding "hammers" at the end of that
> document.
if awl had unixtime stamp for last change time, one could add time test
for at least x days where its was score aveageing, but if less then x days
dont give negative for ham
that would hardened it more to be
On 3/7/11 4:13 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
On 03/06/2011 11:33 AM, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:51 -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
I just found an incoming message which is ham but marked as spam.
It received a score of 14 because it is in th
On 3/7/2011 2:10 AM, Mynabbler wrote:
Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I'd agree, but users wont rebel against Yahoo unless they begin to see
actual bounces to their sent mail.
I don't know about your end users, but ours typically get flummoxed if mail
from this "well known and trusted" free mail p
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
On 03/06/2011 11:33 AM, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:51 -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
I just found an incoming message which is ham but marked as spam.
It received a score of 14 because it is in the auto white-list.
Shouldn't it receive a ne
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:51:47 +
Ned Slider wrote:
> Like you, I've yet to find a reliable set of meta rules to
> effectively deal with this junk and invariably it turns into a game
> of chasing one's tail.
We use an in-house DNSBL based on our reputation-reporting code
(http://www.mimedefang.
On 07/03/11 12:10, Mynabbler wrote:
Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I'd agree, but users wont rebel against Yahoo unless they begin to see
actual bounces to their sent mail.
I don't know about your end users, but ours typically get flummoxed if mail
from this "well known and trusted" free mail pro
On 03/06/2011 11:33 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:51 -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
>> I just found an incoming message which is ham but marked as spam.
>> It received a score of 14 because it is in the auto white-list.
>> Shouldn't it receive a negative score?
>
> http://wiki.
On Mar 6, 2011, at 3:37 AM, Mynabbler wrote:
> The amount of junkmail coming from your systems is unbelievable. How hard is
> it to implement a cap on the amount of messages people can send out daily
> with your systems.
They do that.
> And that includes the number of Cc's and Bcc's one
> messag
W dniu 07.03.2011 13:40, Michelle Konzack pisze:
> Hello,
>
> since 2011-01-19 I have a problem because my FTTH was accidently cuted
> and now no one want ot be responsable including my ISP.
>
> OK, <88.168.69.36> had an rDNS to and was working
> perfectly and gotten never rejects except from
Hello,
since 2011-01-19 I have a problem because my FTTH was accidently cuted
and now no one want ot be responsable including my ISP.
OK, <88.168.69.36> had an rDNS to and was working
perfectly and gotten never rejects except from Hotmail which use a realy
weird ANTI-SPAM service/policy
Now I
Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
>
> I'd agree, but users wont rebel against Yahoo unless they begin to see
> actual bounces to their sent mail.
>
I don't know about your end users, but ours typically get flummoxed if mail
from this "well known and trusted" free mail providers would not arrive to
them
Hi Alex,
thanks for those two important points.
Each question and answer is now attributed with the author, a link to
the original post (apache's mailing list archives) and the date it was
contributed.
Regards,
Stefan
Am 23.02.2011 14:54, schrieb Alex:
Hi,
I'm currently doing research fo
On 3/6/2011 3:15 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 06/03/11 11:46, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I have no comment on your proposed solution. I can however point out the
statistics that I see on my own spam traps.
It seems that 90%+ of the spam coming from DNSWL listed hosts is Yahoo
and Hotmail which are li
14 matches
Mail list logo
