Per Jessen wrote:
> I got the following reject this morning:
>
> : host mail.example.com[1.2.3.4] said: 550
> Dynamic
> Style reverse DNS IP=[212.25.14.40].Rejected by MagicSpam
> 1.0.4-9.1 (http://www.magicspam.com/).
>
>
> Do a reverse look up of 212.25.14.40, and you'll see that
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 01:34 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RDNS_NONE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
> >
> > INVALID_DATE is the rule triggered here, but not above. The overall
> > score difference of ~1.6 matches this rule's sc
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Henrik K wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:27:55PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 11/16, John Hardin wrote:
I don't think you'd ever see good results in the mass checks. The
masscheck corpora retain spam for an extended pe
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 08:51 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
>> This is the first time I have used this software so sorry if it's a
>> stupid
>> question but SpamAssassin is giving us differing results on the same
>> email
>> when they are run on different
