Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 08:51 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
>> This is the first time I have used this software so sorry if it's a
>> stupid
>> question but SpamAssassin is giving us differing results on the same
>> email
>> when they are run on different websites.
>
> Some of this is quite confusing. What do you mean, websites? What
> exactly are you testing with SA, and how do you call SA?
>
>
>> Classic ASP Site
>> VERSION: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08)
>> SCORE: 5.2
>> Spam Tests: FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_NONE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Do run sa-update. Now. This rule falsely *always* triggers since Jan 1,
> 2010. It has been fixed that same day.
>
>
>> VB .NET Site
>> VERSION: from localhost by 102796-NZ1-01.l
>> SCORE: 6.8
>> Spam Tests:
>> FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,RDNS_NONE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
>
> INVALID_DATE is the rule triggered here, but not above. The overall
> score difference of ~1.6 matches this rule's score with score set 1,
> network tests enabled, Bayes disabled (or not sufficiently trained yet).
>
> Again, how and what are you feeding SA? Any chance the ".NET one"
> (whatever that is exactly) is invalidating the Date header?
>
>
>> Above is an example of the issue. Both sites are hosted on the same
>> server
>> but for some reason the .NET one is always higher.
>
> The claimed version looks suspicious in the second case. Appears to be
> part of a Received header, not the SA version. What generated that
> output? Seems the ".NET one" severely mangles the mail or gets bad
> input.
>
> The real SA headers would be better to show anyway.
>
> Also, is this the very same SA installation in both cases, or are both
> sites using local instances?
>
>
> --
> char
> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8?
> c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
>
Thank you for the reply Karsten
Sorry for the vague info.
Basically what we do is run SA over html templates to score them on their
spammyness for want of a better word.
Both of the examples are run on the same template but from different apps
(websites) written in different languages.
>From what you say it looks like the .NET app is having trouble with the
dates so I can pass this back to the person that coded it.
Thanks again
Justin
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Differing-results-from-same-email-tp30230681p30236567.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
