On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 22:55 +0100, John Horne wrote:
> I grabbed a copy of the [DecodeShortURLs] plugin and tried it this afternoon
> (on a
> CentOS 5.5 system). We log all our spamd messages to /var/log/maillog
> via syslog. For the plugin I disabled all the options except
> 'url_shortener_syslog
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 11:30 +0100, Steve Freegard wrote:
> >
> > Hopefully it will be useful to others; you can grab it from:
> >
> > http://www.fsl.com/support/DecodeShortURLs.pm
> > http://www.fsl.com/support/DecodeShortURLs.cf
> >
>
...
>
> - Added option to allow logging to syslog (mail.info)
John Wilcock wrote:
Le 04/10/2010 17:02, Kris Deugau a écrit :
Not sure exactly what this test actually checks (since it's an eval rule
I gave up on tracing after the third layer of
"$self->callanotherfunction"), but it should not be triggering at all on
this set of Received: headers IMO:
...
On 10/4/2010 9:30 AM, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
> Is somebody using the chickenpox-rules in his actual SA-Config and can tell me
> something about the SPAM-Hits?
>
> Do you think it´s advisable for us to use it?
I used it for a long time and then removed it because it was generating
a few f
Le 04/10/2010 17:02, Kris Deugau a écrit :
Not sure exactly what this test actually checks (since it's an eval rule
I gave up on tracing after the third layer of
"$self->callanotherfunction"), but it should not be triggering at all on
this set of Received: headers IMO:
...
The entire /16 is ass
Not sure exactly what this test actually checks (since it's an eval rule
I gave up on tracing after the third layer of
"$self->callanotherfunction"), but it should not be triggering at all on
this set of Received: headers IMO:
Return-Path:
Received: from n1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (n1.bull
On 10/4/10 10:50 AM, co...@jarys.be I Advanced Digital Workflow wrote:
Hello,
I'm using the filter for 1week.
It's working great but there are a few large spam systems who still
get in the inbox.
I work for about 2 years with
http://www.spamcop.net
to report spam.
SA can send to spamcop i
Hello,
I'm using the filter for 1week.
It's working great but there are a few large spam systems who still get
in the inbox.
I work for about 2 years with
http://www.spamcop.net
to report spam.
Is there a place or website for spamassassin where I can punt the Email
headers of real spam?
So
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
Sorry, but is it possible to combine
__TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
Can somebody help me to build this rule?
Please look at the reply to "Own Rule" I posted in the last two days.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZh
Is somebody using the chickenpox-rules in his actual SA-Config and can tell me
something about the SPAM-Hits?
Do you think it´s advisable for us to use it?
On 10/3/2010 8:10 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
As I said in my original message. The rule itself would have no
points. It would be combined with other rules like large sums of
money and transfer and I'm someone you don't know.
You mean, like the ADVANCE_FEE
On 04/10/10 07:00, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
Sorry, but is it possible to combine
__TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
Can somebody help me to build this rule?
Thanks in advance
metaTO_EQ_FROM_IN_SUBJECT(__TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT)
describeTO_
That´s not complicated!
Only use the RelayCountry-Plugin.
>> I'd like to just block all Arabic.
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
On man 04 okt 2010 08:00:59 CEST, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote
Sorry, but is it possible to combine
__TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
Can somebody help me to build this rule?
meta foo (__TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.htm
On 10/04/2010 06:51 PM, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote:
> That´s not complicated!
> Only use the RelayCountry-Plugin.
Huh? You are suggesting Arabic spam exclusively comes from Arabic
countries? The same way English spam only comes from England? ;-)
What you want is a properly working textcat
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On man 04 okt 2010 08:00:59 CEST, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote
Sorry, but is it possible to combine
__TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
Can somebody help me to build this rule?
meta foo (__TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT)
Or just wa
Sorry, but is it possible to combine
__TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
Can somebody help me to build this rule?
Thanks in advance
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Oktober 2010 04:00
An: users@spamassassin.
Hi @ all
last week I´ve changed the bayes store method from file-mode to mysql.
With sa-learn --dump magic I can see, that bayes is furthermore learning ham
and spam!
In my spamd.log I only get the bayes result BAYES_00 and no other bayes scores!?
After spamassassin --lint everything seems t
18 matches
Mail list logo
