Sorry, but is it possible to combine __TO_EQ_FROM and __FROM_IN_SUBJECT in a meta rule?
Can somebody help me to build this rule? Thanks in advance -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org] Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Oktober 2010 04:00 An: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: Own Rule On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, RW wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin >> <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Hans-Werner Friedemann wrote: >> > >> > > Has anyone an idea how I can implement an check whether the >> > > eMail-recipient is the sender an[d] the eMail-Adress appears in >> > > the subject to[o]? >> > >> > Use the __TO_EQ_FROM meta rule that's being distributed via >> > sa-update. >> > >> > What exactly do you want to check for? >> >> As I read it he wants >> >> __TO_EQ_FROM && __FROM_IN_SUBJECT >> >> where __FROM_IN_SUBJECT would presumably be constructed in a similar >> way to __TO_EQ_FROM > > Gah. Quick answer after brief skim. Sorry. > > I'll put that together and add it to my sandbox, likely tomorrow. ...not too shabby: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20101002-r1003754-n/T_FROM_IN_TO_AND_SUBJ/detail I'll promote it shortly if it keeps that level of performance. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- No representation without taxation! ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 76 days until TRON Legacy
