Configuring SPF

2010-09-09 Thread Alex
Hi, I have a box running postfix and v3.2.5 with perl-5.8.8, and would like to get SPF working. I can install the SPF-Query module, and it works, but I'd like to get Mail::SPF::Server working: [2616] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF ('require' failed) [2616] dbg: diag: module not instal

Re: [configuration] handle_user and autolearn

2010-09-09 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: I'm using spamassassin for some weeks, and all is working fine. I just have two questions: 1. While checking my logs, I find this string each time a mail is filtered: Sep 9 10:59:45 HOSTNAME spamd[3126]: spamd: handle_user unable to find user: 'USER

[configuration] handle_user and autolearn

2010-09-09 Thread Cédric Jeanneret
Hello, I'm using spamassassin for some weeks, and all is working fine. I just have two questions: 1. While checking my logs, I find this string each time a mail is filtered: Sep 9 10:59:45 HOSTNAME spamd[3126]: spamd: handle_user unable to find user: 'USERNAME' Sep 9 10:59:45 HOSTNAME spamd[312

Re: Checking envelope sender

2010-09-09 Thread Joseph Brennan
-- Re: Joseph Brennan: Why doesn't sendmail reject it like it does here? (..) .. Domain name required for sender address I cannot afford rejecting all null senders as those could be legitimate Delivery Status Notification messages. What I am looking is a pattern for line: MAIL FROM: <"do not

Re: Messages Stuck In Postfix

2010-09-09 Thread Mark Martinec
Jason, > After a new OpenSuSE 11.3 mail server build (SpamAssassin 3.3.1, Postfix > 2.7.1, invoking SpamAssassin using Amavisd-new) I'm seeing messages getting > stuck in the Postfix queue with errors similar to this: > > host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=24421-02,

Re: Messages Stuck In Postfix

2010-09-09 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 9.9.2010 17:53, Jason Hollenberg wrote: > After a new OpenSuSE 11.3 mail server build (SpamAssassin 3.3.1, Postfix > 2.7.1, invoking SpamAssassin using Amavisd-new) I'm seeing messages getting > stuck in the Postfix queue with errors similar to this: > > host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.

Re: sa-update 3.3 daily changes

2010-09-09 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, RW wrote: The current rules are 39 months before the ham ages out. If someone has done an empirical study that shows that the FP rate deteriorates significantly after 39 months then that's fine. If the figure has just been plucked out of the air, I don't see the sense in

Re: sa-update 3.3 daily changes

2010-09-09 Thread RW
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:03:22 -0500 Daniel McDonald wrote: > On 9/9/10 7:46 AM, "RW" wrote: > > > > > > Would it not be sensible to keep ham for as long as necessary, and > > supplement the spam corpus with spamtraps? > > Ham is plentiful Then relaxing the limit wont be needed, and it wont

Messages Stuck In Postfix

2010-09-09 Thread Jason Hollenberg
After a new OpenSuSE 11.3 mail server build (SpamAssassin 3.3.1, Postfix 2.7.1, invoking SpamAssassin using Amavisd-new) I'm seeing messages getting stuck in the Postfix queue with errors similar to this: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=24421-02, spam_scan FAILED:

Re: sa-update 3.3 daily changes

2010-09-09 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 9/9/10 7:46 AM, "RW" wrote: > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT) > John Hardin wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, RW wrote: > >>> What's the reason for the age limit? >> >> The nature of spam (and, to a lesser degree, ham, barring major >> changes like the widespread adoption of HTML ema

Re: sa-update 3.3 daily changes

2010-09-09 Thread RW
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, RW wrote: > > What's the reason for the age limit? > > The nature of spam (and, to a lesser degree, ham, barring major > changes like the widespread adoption of HTML email) changes over > time. A rule that hit lots