On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, RW wrote:
The current rules are 39 months before the ham ages out.
If someone has done an empirical study that shows that the FP rate
deteriorates significantly after 39 months then that's fine. If the
figure has just been plucked out of the air, I don't see the sense in
halting rule development to stick to it.
Nit: rule development does not halt. Automatic publication of updated
rules and generated scores halts.
That said. I agree with you about aging the ham corpus. (Daryl: I
apologize, I mistyped when I appeared to agree with you when we were
discussing this a while back.)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Win95: Where do you want to go today?
Vista: Where will Microsoft allow you to go today?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
8 days until the 223rd anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution
