Well I am not out of the Dog House yet.
So, by some miracle I was able to get yum to work and was able to use it to
update Spamassassion. I was so happy because this was the safest way to do
this. But yum didn't have ver 3.3 available so I was able to update to:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.4
runnin
On 8/11/2010 1:30 PM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
Matt Kettler wrote:
1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's a
script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist
forever, even when stale. (there are no timestamps on entries, so
expiry i
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track of
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, RW wrote:
1) Rename the .cf file back to the original name so sa-update can
find it
2) Run sa-update
3) Rename the .cf file to z_sought_rules_yerp_org.cf
4) Restart spamd
Would it not be simpler just to do something like this
grep -E "^score"
/var/db/spamassassin/*/sough
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
In case anyone else is following this...
The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
loses track of the file and will download a new copy on every run.
What I
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:30 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> In case anyone else is following this...
>
> The sa-update process made things a bit more complex than simply
> renaming the file after updates. If that's all you do, then sa-update
> loses track of the file and will download a new copy on
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:30:40 -0400 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > > The current situation is: automatic rule updates are only generated
> > > when the corpa of recent messages used in the nightly masscheck is
> > > sufficiently large (150k+ of both spam an
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:30:40 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> >> Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
> >> updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make sure
> >> I
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:26:31 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On ons 11 aug 2010 19:35:35 CEST, RW wrote
>
> > That should be count/total-score not count/token.
>
> total-score/count
I actually meant it in the sense of "a-stroke-b" rather than
"a-divided-by-b"
> will also work with mask of 0
On 8/11/2010 3:30 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
>> updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make sure I
>> am running the rules from the dedicated channel and not the updates
On ons 11 aug 2010 19:35:35 CEST, RW wrote
That should be count/total-score not count/token.
total-score/count
will also work with mask of 0.0.0.0/8 ?
sa below 3.3.x had it hardcoded to /16
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Right. And I'm checking for updates several times a day. If the
updates channel is not keeping up with sought, I need to make sure I am
running the rules from the dedicated channel and not the updates channel
so I have the latest.
The current situat
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
We are currently running SA v3.3.1 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and are
planning to move to Red Hat. I don’t have much experience with Red Hat
(or Linux in general). Could you point me to some tips and
documentation about installing and running SA on Red Hat?
FY
We are currently running SA v3.3.1 on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and are planning
to move to Red Hat. I don't have much experience with Red Hat (or Linux in
general). Could you point me to some tips and documentation about installing
and running SA on Red Hat?
FYI, on Solaris I install by downl
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:30:17 +0100
RW wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > 1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's
> > a script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist
> > forever, even when stale. (there are no times
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:48:11 -0400
Matt Kettler wrote:
> 1) lack of expiry process causes unbounded database growth. There's a
> script to clean out single-hit entries, but multi-hit persist
> forever, even when stale. (there are no timestamps on entries, so
> expiry isn't possible at present).
On 8/11/2010 12:17 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:57 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Alex wrote:
...
> I did notice this one header discrepancy:
>
> Received: by mail.mydomain.net (Postfix, from userid 78)
>
> What's with the "Postfix, from user 78)"? This should be the server's
> IP address, no?
That header is normal when you're using a "simple"
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:57 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
> > > JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA up
Hi,
>> > Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
>>
>> Great, thanks so much.
>
> Well, you *did* run sa-update since then, no? I mean, at the very least
> early this year. Begs the question, why you still do have that rule.
It's another system that I just adopted, and haven't finishe
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:51 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > > Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
> > >
> > > The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and is neither part of 3.3, nor
> > > 3.2 stock rules.
> >
> > Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
>
>
On 8/11/2010 11:46 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
>> JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
>> 3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is the
>> Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
>>
>> The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and is neither part of 3.3, nor
>> 3.2 stock rules.
>
> Forgot to mention: After running sa-update WRT 3.2.
Great, thanks so much.
Best,
Alex
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:59 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
> JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
> 3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a reason for this?
Yes, an explicit request by Justi
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:24 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:58 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
> > triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
>
> Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules sinc
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:58 -0400, Alex wrote:
> How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
> triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
Bug 6157 [1], remove open-whois.org rules since domain is cybersquatted.
The rule has been removed a *year* ago, and
I was looking through some of the spam rules, and I noticed that the
JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD rules are included in the main SA updates channel for SA
3.3.1, but the scores are all 0. Is there a reason for this?
The rules from the sought channel have scores, but they are being
overridden by the main upda
Hi,
How does DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS work? I have a system where every message
triggers on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and I can't figure out why.
I had some problems with the headers being mangled, but I was pretty
sure that was fixed. Could this be a postfix or amavisd configuration?
I did notice this one h
Please keep threads on-list, unless you specifically want to talk to me.
Even "boring" end-of-line posts are worthwhile information to the full
thread.
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 18:43 +0200, Andreas Dunkl wrote:
> Am 10.08.2010 13:42, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > Well, that one paragraph isn't a g
On 8/10/2010 7:55 PM, Dennis German wrote:
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:...
due to performance vs accuracy issues, AWL was demoted in SA 3.3x.
Can you please define "demoted".
Changed from enabled by default to disabled by default, larg
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:55:45 -0400
Dennis German wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:...
> due to performance vs accuracy issues, AWL was demoted in SA 3.3x.
>
> Can you please define "demoted".
It's no longer on by default.
Sorry about that I just simply pressed reply, I expected the reply to have
sent my message back to us...@spamassassin.apache.org. So I had to use
forward instead.
anyway, I will start to look into it. but before I do, you said something
that made me think you might have slightly miss understood m
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 19:24 -0700, jdow wrote:
> From: "Martin Gregorie"
> Sent: Monday, 2010/August/09 18:08
>
>
> > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:42 -0700, jdow wrote:
> >> From: "Martin Gregorie"
> >> > Something like this will match a sequence of two capitalised name
> >> > words,
> >> > includ
nonlin wrote:
>
> I am running a Blue Quartz with spamassassin pre installed. I don't know
> the version. I have run the gtube test and it works fine for my admin
> email account, it is marking them as spam. but it is marking any of emails
> for my clients, yet there are several files like the
34 matches
Mail list logo
