Emin Akbulut wrote:
>
> I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
>
> Application: spamd.exe,
> version 3.3.1.2,
> timestamp 0x4b75db31,
> modul IPHLPAPI.DLL_unloaded,
> version 0.0.0.0,
> timestamp 0x49e037a4,
> code 0xc005,
> error loc 0x74f83386,
> eventid 0xe98,
> app star
It's possible, the local DNS server becomes non-responsive -hate Microsoft-
restarting DNS service is not solution, I have to restart machine.
*** I DIDN'T VERIFY IT'S THE ROOT CAUSE OR NOT ***
I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
Application: spamd.exe,
version 3.3.1.2,
times
On 7/14/2010 11:27 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
>
> WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result1.txt
> NET STOP Spamassassin
> NET START Spamassassin
> WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result2.txt
> WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result3.txt
>
> result1: under 6
I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result1.txt
NET STOP Spamassassin
NET START Spamassassin
WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result2.txt
WinSpamC < realspam.txt > result3.txt
result1: under 6.3
result2: very high
result3: under 6.3
On Wed, Jul 14,
Emin Akbulut wrote:
>
> However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the right score at
> first time
> then score goes very low at subsequent checks. spamd runs under system
> account
> and it's User_Prefs file is located
> under C:\Windows\SysWOW64\config\systemprofile\.spamassassin
>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
First run:
---
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=25.7 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT
What sticks out to me is that most of the missing score hits on the
On 7/14/10 2:19 AM, Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
Hi There,
I am currently trying to implement DCC on a small email server to test how
effective it may be. Unfortunately I have been unable to get any results and it
appears that its just simply not working.
I have the following lines in my configuratio
On 7/14/2010 8:42 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> I run SA Win32 port 3.3.1 by JAM Software on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
> Spamassassin.exe always calculates the same score, coz User_Prefs file is
> under my docs (C:\Users\ea\.spamassassin)
>
> However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the
I run SA Win32 port 3.3.1 by JAM Software on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
Spamassassin.exe always calculates the same score, coz User_Prefs file is
under my docs (C:\Users\ea\.spamassassin)
However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the right score at
first time
then score goes very low a
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 06:19 +, Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
> I am currently trying to implement DCC on a small email server to test
> how effective it may be. Unfortunately I have been unable to get any
> results and it appears that its just simply not working.
> I also added the following lines to t
> What I am asking is why a reference to http://querty.ru.gg generates a
> URI
> lookup for ru.gg (ie missing out the first component) whereas a
> reference to
> http://qwerty.ru.com generates a URI lookup for qwerty.ru.com.
>
> Dave
Because the ru.gg second level domain is not in the TWO_LEVEL_D
What I am asking is why a reference to http://querty.ru.gg generates a URI
lookup for ru.gg (ie missing out the first component) whereas a reference to
http://qwerty.ru.com generates a URI lookup for qwerty.ru.com.
Dave
Giampaolo Tomassoni-2 wrote:
>
>> I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 a
> I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 and we received some spam
> recently
> which contained a link to a .ru.gg domain. While investigating whether
> it
> was listed in any of the URIBLs I discovered that if a message contains
> a
> link to "http://qwerty.ru.gg";, spamassassin only looks up the
I'm running SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 and we received some spam recently
which contained a link to a .ru.gg domain. While investigating whether it
was listed in any of the URIBLs I discovered that if a message contains a
link to "http://qwerty.ru.gg";, spamassassin only looks up the domain "ru.gg
On ons 14 jul 2010 02:32:36 CEST, Jason Haar wrote
The idea behind TextCat seems sound, but the only alternative I've found
is Google Translator - but sending your emails to it may not be an
option ;-)
relaycountry maybe ?
or if one make a aspell/ispell plugin
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.co
> It's more of the implementation that needs an update than TextCat
> algorithm
> itself.
>
> Charset/case awareness:
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6229
>
> Better database:
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4152
>
> Etc.. feel free to chime in..
16 matches
Mail list logo