On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
First run:
-----------------------------------------------
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=25.7 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT....
What sticks out to me is that most of the missing score hits on the
second run are from blacklists.
Quite true. What also sticks out to me is that test LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT
disappers which means that the headers on the second run are
substantially different from the headers on the first run.
SOMETHING is severely mangling the mail between the two runs, and quite
obviously this degrades spamassassin's capability to detect spam.
I suppose I should ask (of the OP) WHY there are two runs at all?
- C
