Andy Dills wrote:
That's fair. Except, we're not a "large organization" by any stretch of
the imagination.
Have you checked that you are legitimately exceeding the free query
limit and that something isn't misconfigured and causing multiple
lookups of the same IP address when it could be acc
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 10:42 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> > score URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0
> > score URIBL_DBL_ERROR 0
> > score RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
> >
> > I think those are the only queries that generate lookups against Spamhaus,
> > but I'm not positive.
>
>
Andy Dills wrote:
We felt the amount of money being asked for was unreasonable, as we felt
we likely wouldn't see an increase in spam if we turned them off.
We're paying customers of Spamhaus. Their lists account for about 85%
of our spam rejects. I agree it's not cheap, but it's really eff
Nataraj wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Just wondering about what people are using to detect if email is
coming from a mail list discussion server like yahoo or google
groups. Does anyone have good discussion list detection rules?
I'm not sure about doing this from within spamassassin, but using
p
Marc Perkel wrote:
Just wondering about what people are using to detect if email is
coming from a mail list discussion server like yahoo or google groups.
Does anyone have good discussion list detection rules?
I'm not sure about doing this from within spamassassin, but using
postfix, I have a
In a followup to
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/151470;
Is it possible to set the priority on RBL rules to run after rules, or
not at all if shortcircuited?
I tried:
priority RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET -300
priority RCVD_IN_XBL -300
priority RCVD_IN_PSBL -300
priority R
On 6/11/10 4:40 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/11/10 3:17 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
i've got DOZENS of these, shoud i log a bug for each?
also I have TONS of these type of entries as well, it used to come up
clean before the upgrade,
and I'm also concerned because i get massive amounts
On 6/11/10 3:17 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
i've got DOZENS of these, shoud i log a bug for each?
also I have TONS of these type of entries as well, it used to come up clean
before the upgrade,
and I'm also concerned because i get massive amounts of spamd timeouts is it
related?
Jun 11 15:
i've got DOZENS of these, shoud i log a bug for each?
also I have TONS of these type of entries as well, it used to come up clean
before the upgrade,
and I'm also concerned because i get massive amounts of spamd timeouts is it
related?
Jun 11 15:13:15.140 [20711] dbg: rules: meta test VIRUS_
On 6/11/10 1:00 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
Since my upgrade to 3.3.1, I see when running, sa –lint –D that
there’s a bunch of stuff, I assume are no longer used?
Like the entry below
Jun 11 12:57:36.792 [18565] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule AXB_HELO_LH_HOME
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
> Andy Dills wrote:
>
>
> I think the maintainers of SA should strongly consider defaulting
> Spamhaus to "off". At the very least, it should be better documented
> how to entire disable Spamhaus queries.
I think the maintainers of SA should strongl
On Fri 11 Jun 2010 07:23:51 PM CEST, Marc Perkel wrote
Also - I'd like to make a list of host names where email from celll
phones comes from. Does anyone have a list of domain name or host
names where cell phone email is sent from?
tlds known by me: tel mobi
where domain is the mobile numb
On Fri 11 Jun 2010 07:11:33 PM CEST, Marc Perkel wrote
Just wondering about what people are using to detect if email is
coming from a mail list discussion server like yahoo or google
groups. Does anyone have good discussion list detection rules?
there is a perl module maillist.pm but i dont
Also - I'd like to make a list of host names where email from celll
phones comes from. Does anyone have a list of domain name or host names
where cell phone email is sent from?
Just wondering about what people are using to detect if email is coming
from a mail list discussion server like yahoo or google groups. Does
anyone have good discussion list detection rules?
Hi all,
Since my upgrade to 3.3.1, I see when running, sa -lint -D that there's a
bunch of stuff, I assume are no longer used?
Like the entry below
Jun 11 12:57:36.792 [18565] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule AXB_HELO_LH_HOME
Is there a way to just start clean?
rat
(Sorry about the top post...)
One of the big issues with RBL services like this is the rules that use
them change over time. We quite nicely fit into free use, but I realize
that there are many others who do not. It might be a good enhancement
to SA to be able to make a way to disable all quer
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Dills wrote:
> I think the maintainers of SA should strongly consider defaulting
> Spamhaus to "off". At the very least, it should be better documented
> how to entire disable Spamhaus queries.
IMO defaults should be set for the benefit of SOHO user
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 10:42 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> score URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0
> score URIBL_DBL_ERROR 0
> score RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
>
> I think those are the only queries that generate lookups against Spamhaus,
> but I'm not positive.
IIRC that doesn't disable all DNS lookups against ZEN. You'd also n
On 6/11/10 10:42 AM, Andy Dills wrote:
We felt the amount of money being asked for was unreasonable, as we felt
we likely wouldn't see an increase in spam if we turned them off.
should I mention that the (optional) reputation based dcc.pm (which is
supported in SA 3.3.x) is really CHEAP?
(
On Fri 11 Jun 2010 04:42:31 PM CEST, Andy Dills wrote
After recently upgrading to a new mail cluster with SA 3.3.1, we were
contacted (at every imaginable POC address) with a solicitation to
purchase access to utilize the Spamhaus blacklists, or they'll stop
answering our queries.
mail cluster
On 2010-06-11 16:42, Andy Dills wrote:
After recently upgrading to a new mail cluster with SA 3.3.1, we were
contacted (at every imaginable POC address) with a solicitation to
purchase access to utilize the Spamhaus blacklists, or they'll stop
answering our queries.
We felt the amount of mone
On 11.06.10 10:42, Andy Dills wrote:
> After recently upgrading to a new mail cluster with SA 3.3.1, we were
> contacted (at every imaginable POC address) with a solicitation to
> purchase access to utilize the Spamhaus blacklists, or they'll stop
> answering our queries.
You apparently generat
After recently upgrading to a new mail cluster with SA 3.3.1, we were
contacted (at every imaginable POC address) with a solicitation to
purchase access to utilize the Spamhaus blacklists, or they'll stop
answering our queries.
We felt the amount of money being asked for was unreasonable, as w
On 6/11/10 8:10 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
tested this on email with
twitter-resetpw-example=domain@postmaster.twitter.com and rule
hits fine on tests, lint likes it, compiles on some systems, but not all.
All running spamassassin 3.3.1 and re2c 0.13.5
def_whitelist_from_spftwitter-reset
tested this on email with
twitter-resetpw-example=domain@postmaster.twitter.com and rule hits
fine on tests, lint likes it, compiles on some systems, but not all.
All running spamassassin 3.3.1 and re2c 0.13.5
def_whitelist_from_spftwitter-resetp...@postmaster.twitter.com
lint and sa-compi
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:16:02PM +, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Can you tell me what all kind of attachment scanning spamassassin does.
sorry, not in detail - but you're free to read the code yourself
> Can you point me to some good reference that can give me a good idea about
> attachmen
27 matches
Mail list logo
