Please note that the ZMI German rules are very old, and while there
have been a few recent tweaks to the file, it doesn't look terribly
useful to any system that uses the Bayesian filter (more on this
later). I would expect these rules to fire quite rarely, even in
environments that have lots of G
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:35 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 05:24 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Unfortunately, in this case, the fact that it isn't a proper, raw
> > message is not irrelevant. The ok_locales setting, which is part of your
> > original question, depends on the char-set
On 5/25/10 5:22 PM, "fchan" wrote:
> I'm recently got some spam with link to bit.ly
A fairly common url shortening service
>if
> this could be a compromise of Google or something.
Nope, just someone abusing a link shortener.
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281
On 05/26/2010 05:24 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, in this case, the fact that it isn't a proper, raw
> message is not irrelevant. The ok_locales setting, which is part of your
> original question, depends on the char-set used. Which is missing from
> the sample. We only can assu
I'm recently got some spam with link to bit.ly which I did a Whois
and it appears to MX server for Google/GoogleMail which is from NTT
America, Inc and I'm checking if any other people seen this and if
this could be a compromise of Google or something. Here is an excerpt
of the message with the
On Tue, 25 May 2010, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Now I've got new message when starting spamd and don't know how to fix it:
"info: rules: meta test T_OBFU_ATTACH_MISSP has dependency
'OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH' with a zero score"
I see this kind of errors almost every day, but I just ignore them. They
do
On Tue 25 May 2010 08:38:29 PM CEST, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i see spam mails that using Http://example.com
Yes, it is a known issue. Fixed in SVN already, and will be shipped with
the next release 3.3.2.
super
# save rule as 99_lo
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> i see spam mails that using Http://example.com
Yes, it is a known issue. Fixed in SVN already, and will be shipped with
the next release 3.3.2.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ cha
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 12:51 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2010/05/25 10:48 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
> >
> > That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
> > message, including the most common headers displayed to th
Maybe I'm a little obessive... hahahaha, but that's ok, I've managed
to get rid of that warning
--
Daniel Iserhard
CPD - UFRGS
Departamento de Redes e Suporte
Divisão de Suporte a Software
Citando Jari Fredriksson :
Now I've got new message when starting spamd and don't know how to fix it:
> Now I've got new message when starting spamd and don't know how to fix it:
>
> "info: rules: meta test T_OBFU_ATTACH_MISSP has dependency
> 'OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH' with a zero score"
>
I see this kind of errors almost every day, but I just ignore them. They
do not sound dangerous to me.
I may be wro
On 2010/05/25 10:48 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most com
> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > A user reported the following FN [...]
>
> It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
>
> That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
> message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
>
>
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 09:27 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> A user reported the following FN [...]
It is not a FN. It isn't even a proper message.
That's some headers, plus a screen-scraped, rendered version of the
message, including the most common headers displayed to the user.
Without a RAW sam
Actually I added the line
"score OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH 0.1"
and it seemed to work.
thnx, i'll keep testing
--
Daniel Iserhard
CPD - UFRGS
Departamento de Redes e Suporte
Divisão de Suporte a Software
Citando Giampaolo Tomassoni :
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 10:25 -0300, Daniel Iserhard wrote:
Have yo
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 10:25 -0300, Daniel Iserhard wrote:
> Have you tried setting a non-zero score for OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH?
Martin,
it seems to me the problem is in some SA rule update. 72_scores.cf states:
score OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH 2.299 0.000 2.299 0.000
which means 0 in network-based SA
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 10:25 -0300, Daniel Iserhard wrote:
> Now I've got new message when starting spamd and don't know how to fix
> it:
>
>
> "info: rules: meta test T_OBFU_ATTACH_MISSP has dependency
> 'OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH' with a zero score"
>
Have you tried setting a non-zero score for OBFU_TEX
On 2010/05/24 6:17 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
On 05/25/2010 09:47 AM, RW wrote:.
My guess is that none of of these is being hit because there's
enough English mixed-in with the Arabic.
I think the "FARAWAY" rules and other locale checks are dependent on
email using the old, pre-Unicode "charset" fo
Now I've got new message when starting spamd and don't know how to fix it:
"info: rules: meta test T_OBFU_ATTACH_MISSP has dependency
'OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH' with a zero score"
This is a Ubuntu Lucid test server with MailScanner, Spamassassin, Postfix &
ClamAV
--
Daniel Agra Iserhard
iserh...@gmail
i see spam mails that using Http://example.com to bypass url hits :(
where http://example.com is url blacklisted
in 3.3.1
--
xpoint
Hi all,
I manage a number of mail servers for $ISP and was wondering what kind
of average load is placed on the servers.
I realise this is a 'finger in the air' kind of measurement, but if
anybody's got any facts, that'd be great...
Cheers,
Joel
--
$ echo "kpfmAdpoofdufevq/dp/vl" | perl -pe 's
21 matches
Mail list logo
