David B Funk wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
>> These are the stats for the week
>> Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 58249
>> Number of spams : 54479 ( 93.53%)
>> Number of clean messages: 3770 ( 6.47%)
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
> > > in my log
> > >
> > > I started with 10 max children and have been rais
On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:50:32 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > The reason I was trying to tweak it, maybe I'm going about it
> > wrong, but spamd winds up timing out a lot. Then people call and
> > say there messages were not delivered or delayed etc...
>
> That may be a consequence of the swap u
On 5/21/10 7:35 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 00:13 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 17:43 -0400, Adam Katz wrote:
header SINGLE_HEADER_2K ALL:raw =~ /^(?=.{2048,3071}$)/m
It does not match a single header, let alone a *specifi
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 00:13 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 17:43 -0400, Adam Katz wrote:
> > header SINGLE_HEADER_2K ALL:raw =~ /^(?=.{2048,3071}$)/m
>
> It does not match a single header, let alone a *specific* header as the
> one mentioned, but ALL headers. It effec
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
> > in my log
> >
> > I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
> > 40 , but still getting the messa
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 17:43 -0400, Adam Katz wrote:
> header SINGLE_HEADER_2K ALL:raw =~ /^(?=.{2048,3071}$)/m
It does not match a single header, let alone a *specific* header as the
one mentioned, but ALL headers. It effectively checks the entire
headers' size.
As I understood it, the desired
Michael Scheidell mused:
>> would adding 1 point for each 1K of header length help?
J.D. Falk responded:
> Interesting idea! I don't know the precise semantics of the
> contents of that header, but this certainly sounds possible.
Seconded.
I don't think this is efficient at all (I'm leaning on
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
> > in my log
> >
> > I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
> > 40 , but still getting the messag
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>> Just accept the fact that mail gets into a queue when using processes like
>> SA. If outgoing spam is not a concern, set your system so that outbound
>> mail is not passed thru SA.
>>
>
> I actually only use the exim/sa as incoming filter, I do not send through it.
>Just accept the fact that mail gets into a queue when using processes like
>SA. If outgoing spam is not a concern, set your system so that outbound
>mail is not passed thru SA.
I actually only use the exim/sa as incoming filter, I do not send through it.
The reason I was trying to tweak it, ma
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
> in my log
>
> I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
> 40 , but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I
> go given these specs:
>
> sa 3.3 on f
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:37 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting
> > entries in my log
> >
> > I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am
> > now at 40 , but still getting the messages (
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries in
> my log
>
> I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at
> 40 , but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I go
> given th
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries in my
log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at 40
, but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I go given
these specs:
sa 3.3 on freebsd , hardwar
Sure enough, that error message is in the /var/log/mail.log file several
times a day. I think this may be the problem I was having. The limit is
now 5 so hopefully this will happen very infrequently now and perhaps it
will solve the problem.
Kaleb Hosie wrote:
>
>> I'm using Debian. Now the
>
> I'm using spamassassin with sendmail via spamass-milter. Many users are
> using Open Webmail to read mail, and sometimes when they try to send, the
> system hangs for 10+ seconds. Often it sends immediately however.
>
You are scanning outgoing messages. Is this really a requirement?
If not,
> I'm using Debian. Now the question is, will restoring
> maxchildren from 2 back to 5 help the problem? I will have
> to wait and see.
>
One way of telling whether this is the problem or not is to search your
maillog for an entry like the following:
Apr 27 05:59:45 mailgate spamd[23853]: pr
Ok, I did a broader search using:
cat `locate spamass | grep etc` | grep child
Turns out it's in /etc/defaults/spamassassin
I'm using Debian. Now the question is, will restoring maxchildren from 2
back to 5 help the problem? I will have to wait and see.
--
View this message in context:
ht
> Does anyone know where the setting for max-children is?
>
> If I run 'ps aux | grep spam' I can see:
>
> That spamd is run like so:
>
> /usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 2
> --helper-home-dir -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid
>
> However, I do not see where to specify max-children
Does anyone know where the setting for max-children is?
If I run 'ps aux | grep spam' I can see:
That spamd is run like so:
/usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 2 --helper-home-dir -d
--pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid
However, I do not see where to specify max-children in any configuration
> I'm using spamassassin with sendmail via spamass-milter.
> Many users are using Open Webmail to read mail, and sometimes
> when they try to send, the system hangs for 10+ seconds.
> Often it sends immediately however.
I would start with examining your maillog (/var/log/maillog). If that
doe
I'm using spamassassin with sendmail via spamass-milter. Many users are
using Open Webmail to read mail, and sometimes when they try to send, the
system hangs for 10+ seconds. Often it sends immediately however.
When I setup the system, I remember reading somewhere that it might be a
good idea
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:58 +0200, Sasa wrote:
> Hi, I have a problem with some mails that are discarded when in body message
> there is a web link with http prefix, i.e. with:
> http://www.example.com/example
>
> with this link the mail is discarded and in log file I have:
You didn't show *any*
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 21:34 -0400, Robert Palmer wrote:
> yum install insisted I have current version so I used cpan which got me
> to 3.3.1. Should I stop there or consider 3.3.2 or 3.4.x?
http://spamassassin.apache.org/
Did you have a look there, yet? 3.3.1 is the latest stable release.
3.3.2
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 06:53 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2010, John Horne wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
> > always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
> >
> > Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simpl
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 15:51 +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 2010-05-21 15:40, John Horne wrote:
> If I send a message containing:
>
> some text
> userid:
> some more text
...
> >
> > Can someone show me how to match a newline character in the above rule
> > please?
>
> can you
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>> > It's the same issue as was already resolved for the ClamAV plugin,
>> > the data structure changed from hash to a list (so that ordering
>> > of add_header can be maintained).
>> >
>> > See:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/sho
Hi, I have a problem with some mails that are discarded when in body message
there is a web link with http prefix, i.e. with:
http://www.example.com/example
with this link the mail is discarded and in log file I have:
[r...@mail ~]# grep 707F026A302 /var/log/maillog
May 20 10:52:16 mail postfix
On Fri, 21 May 2010, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simple rule:
body LOCAL_JH /userid:\s*\n/i
which should look for 'useri
On 2010-05-21 15:40, John Horne wrote:
Hello,
Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simple rule:
body LOCAL_JH /userid:\s*\n/i
which should look for 'useri
Hello,
Can you tell it's Friday afternoon? What should be a simple problem
always seems to become a nightmare on Friday afternoons! :-)
Using SA 3.3.1 I have the following simple rule:
body LOCAL_JH /userid:\s*\n/i
which should look for 'userid:', any number of spaces and then a NL
c
> > It's the same issue as was already resolved for the ClamAV plugin,
> > the data structure changed from hash to a list (so that ordering
> > of add_header can be maintained).
> >
> > See:
> > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6254
>
> Ah, thank you. I made this change in
33 matches
Mail list logo
