On 20/03/2010 9:53 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>>> try it, pretend you are looking for sa332.
>>
>> Again, I'm pretty sure you're not supposed to be directed to a mirror
>> unless it has updated. Although a plain 404 would be better.
>>
>>> with all the problems lately, fake search pages, legit (yaho
> > try it, pretend you are looking for sa332.
>
> Again, I'm pretty sure you're not supposed to be directed to a mirror
> unless it has updated. Although a plain 404 would be better.
>
> > with all the problems lately, fake search pages, legit (yahoo search,
> > doubleclick, etc) serving up mal
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Mark Martinec wrote:
> The offending rule is FILL_THIS_FORM_LONG from 72_active.cf.
I'll look into it.
Fix is in local masscheck testing.
Fix committed.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On 20/03/2010 12:34 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> O
>> http://www.takeyellow.com/
>>
>> But the mirror is also there:
>>
>> http://www.takeyellow.com/apachemirror/
>>
>> I agree that combination looks fishy first. But I rather think that this
>>
> I think I would worry about the integrety of a
Not officially released yet, so consider this RC quality. ports committers
always make minor changes before committing the port update.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144911
it incorporates the DKIM.pm patch to add back in unwhitelist_dkim
the pkg-install will try to ask you to in
O
http://www.takeyellow.com/
But the mirror is also there:
http://www.takeyellow.com/apachemirror/
I agree that combination looks fishy first. But I rather think that this
I think I would worry about the integrety of a mirror like that, but up
to SA folks. if they think its ok to use the
Michael Scheidell wrote on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:15:29 -0400:
> I have a printscreen from that site (that for some reason I can't email)
Well, everyone can just go there and so for him/herself ;-)
http://www.takeyellow.com/
But the mirror is also there:
http://www.takeyellow.com/apachemirror/
I
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 11:58 -0400, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> In my environment, postfix passes the message onto the exchange server
> so once it releases the message, I don't have anything to train bayes
> with since it's deleted.
>
Add an 'always_bcc' directive to your Postfix configuration to grab a
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:25, Martin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:j...@jkart.de]
>> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 6:38 PM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.1 available
>>
>> schrieb Michael Scheidell:
>> > On 3
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:j...@jkart.de]
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 6:38 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.3.1 available
>
> schrieb Michael Scheidell:
> > On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
> >> Release No
10 matches
Mail list logo