I just upgraded to 3.3.0 from 3.2.4 and get the following errors:
Jan 26 22:10:41.856 [32397] dbg: plugin: loading FuzzyOcr from
/etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm
Jan 26 22:10:42.038 [32397] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure
dependency in open while running with -T switch at
/etc/mail/spa
So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
HINET: Control of approx 8,476,149 IP addresses
http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/3/AS3462.htm
user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?
But that's what I did, as you see from
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
headers.
From: "Kai Schaetzl"
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/January/26 03:57
Warren Togami wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:15:23 -0500:
Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
Isn't that a given? The point was that I don't see a reason to ask here
about this. It's deprecated and it's
Surely you jest, Sir.
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Togami"
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/January/26 03:15
On 01/26/2010 05:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
Kai
Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
Warren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Martinec wrote:
>> perl 5.8.8
>
> --- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm (revision 903517)
> +++ lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm (working copy)
> @@ -1438,6 +1438,9 @@
> # bayes directory
> my $main = $self->{bayes}->{m
David,
> Trying to import a bayes db, I get:
>
> #sa-learn --import
> bayes: perform_upgrade: Insecure dependency in open while running with
> -T switch at /usr/share/perl/5.8/File/Copy.pm line 133.
>
> perl 5.8.8
--- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm (revision 903517)
+++ lib/Mail/Sp
On 01/26/2010 06:16 PM, David Morton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to import a bayes db, I get:
#sa-learn --import
bayes: perform_upgrade: Insecure dependency in open while running with
- -T switch at /usr/share/perl/5.8/File/Copy.pm line 133.
perl 5.8.8
What di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to import a bayes db, I get:
#sa-learn --import
bayes: perform_upgrade: Insecure dependency in open while running with
- -T switch at /usr/share/perl/5.8/File/Copy.pm line 133.
perl 5.8.8
- --
David Morton
Morton Software & Design http://
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page, it's a
On 01/26/2010 03:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page, i
>On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:13:53 -0500, you wrote:
>Quoting "john ffitch" :
>
>> After attempting to move to Sa 3.3.0
>>
>> water:~ # /etc/cron.daily/sa-update
>> http: GET http://yerp.org/rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz request
>> failed: 404 Not Found: > 2.0//EN"> 404 Not Found
>> Not Found The
Charles Gregory wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:10:51 -0500 (EST):
> Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
> Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update channels in due time?
Just do yourself. Follow the instructions on the download page, it's a
*one liner* !
Kai
--
Get your web
Quoting "john ffitch" :
After attempting to move to Sa 3.3.0
water:~ # /etc/cron.daily/sa-update
http: GET http://yerp.org/rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz request
failed: 404 Not Found: 2.0//EN"> 404 Not Found
Not Found The requested URL
/rules/stage/330903380.tar.gz was not found on this
r
it that for my sandbox last night.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100126/?rule=/FROM_W&srcpath=khop
Either it's too new or it's just not worthwhile to check for. We'll see.
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Warren Togami wrote:
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for RPM
packages and distro-specific notes.
Anyone know where to find a RHEL(CentOS) 4 rpm?
Or will it appear in the CentOS 4 official update
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for
RPM packages and distro-specific notes.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
That seems to be identical with the rc4 version that Justin offered for
last testing on Jan 21, right? I've been running it since then with no
problems.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On 26/01/2010 11:33 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.0
Introduction
This is a major release, incorporating enhancements and bug fixes that have
accumulated in a year and a half of development since the 3.2.5 release.
Apart from some new
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:20:41 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> I just received medspam with a new approach I've not seen before. Both
> the subject and the plaintext body contain gibberish with the payload
> (an advertising phrase and web URL) travelling as the personal name
> part of the sender's a
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.0
Introduction
This is a major release, incorporating enhancements and bug fixes that have
accumulated in a year and a half of development since the 3.2.5 release.
Apart from some new or changed dependencies on perl modules, this v
I just received medspam with a new approach I've not seen before. Both
the subject and the plaintext body contain gibberish with the payload
(an advertising phrase and web URL) travelling as the personal name part
of the sender's address. I have no idea whether the sender's address was
forged. Fort
Russ,
> I have not gotten this into the bugzilla, but ... as it appeas
> a 3.3 release is imminent, I though I should mention seeing
> this in my log files:
>
> I am getting this:
>
> Jan 20 18:17:40 vm049244181 spamd[14023]: spamd: Insecure dependency in
> chown while running with -T switch at
Michael Scheidell wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:56:04 -0500:
> if you don't follow the RFC's, you have no reason to complain if people
> who DO follow the RFC's block your email.
There is no RFC requiring back and forward resolution to match. I think
there's not even a requirement for an rDNS, i
Warren Togami wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:15:23 -0500:
> Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
Isn't that a given? The point was that I don't see a reason to ask here
about this. It's deprecated and it's not part of SA.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Se
On 1/26/10 5:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ned Slider wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:47 +:
Indeed. If your domain (jidanni.org) is in fact on a static IP then you
need to get your ISP to update the PTR record to reflect this.
Well, on closer look it appears that he's using a smarth
On 01/26/2010 05:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
Kai
Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
Warren
Ned Slider wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:47 +:
> Indeed. If your domain (jidanni.org) is in fact on a static IP then you
> need to get your ISP to update the PTR record to reflect this.
Well, on closer look it appears that he's using a smarthost. So, there's
no need for another rDNS for h
This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Michael Mansour wrote:
Hi,
Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
It's all because
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
headerSARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0bReceived =~
/\bdynamic.hinet\.(?:com
29 matches
Mail list logo
