jdow a écrit :
> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7780
>
> It can be quite frustrating to run an ISP and comply with the often
> arbitrary, strange, and I suspect contradictory demands of the likes
> of SORBS and Trend Micro. An ISP Abuse handler vents in this article.
>
from the text, the
On 19/12/2009 3:20 PM, Alban Deniz wrote:
> I would like to know if there's a way to report dynamic scores in
> SpamAssassin 3.1.7. I haven't been able to find info for this on the FAQ
> or on the FrontPage.
If I recall correctly the only way to do it is to access the score hash
of the $permsgstat
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, J.D. Falk wrote:
That's IT! PORNOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION!
Sorry. Already been tried.
But no matter what we called it, the users still didn't appreciate their
computers or network going down on them. :)
- C
PS. Let's not get started on how hard disks are smaller than flipp
On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
> it can be measured by finding the WL rule's page on ruleqa.spamassassin.org,
> then examining the OVERLAP section for overlaps with BL rules.
I'd expect that most whitelist operators will automatically de-list any IP
which appears on a respect
>
>
> Nope. It works. I'm looking at 3.3 carefully but nothing
> stands out.
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
Jo,
do you have changes / hopes / ideas / suggestions for SA to make it better
or more better or whatever?
- rh
Hi Warren,
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
On 12/18/2009 08:57 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
This will be released if we go three days without an objection as per build/README
procedure. At that point these archives will be renamed to "rc1" and the
announcements will go out. Please su
Hello,
I've written a Sniffer plugin (SNF4SA) for SpamAssassin, and my plugin doesn't
report dynamic scores for SpamAssassin 3.1.7. The dynamic score reporting
works correctly for SpamAssassin 3.2.5.
I would like to know if there's a way to report dynamic scores in SpamAssassin
3.1.7. I have
What is the recommended version of re2c to use with SpamAssassin v3.3.0? What
about with v3.2.5?
Thanks, Larry
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, jdow wrote:
>> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7780
>>
>> It can be quite frustrating to run an ISP and comply with the often
>> arbitrary, strange, and I suspect contradictory demands of the likes
>> of SORBS and Trend Micro. An ISP Abuse handler vents in this article
> Warren Togami wrote:
>> While whitelists are not directly effective (statistically, when
>> averaged across a large corpus), whitelists are powerful tools in
>> indirect ways including:
>>
>> * Pushing the score beyond the auto-learn threshold for things like
>> Bayes to function without ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
