> Warren Togami wrote: >> While whitelists are not directly effective (statistically, when >> averaged across a large corpus), whitelists are powerful tools in >> indirect ways including: >> >> * Pushing the score beyond the auto-learn threshold for things like >> Bayes to function without manual intervention.
On 17.12.09 11:27, Jason Bertoch wrote: > This does not sound like a positive thing to me. E-mail from any sender > that is malformed enough to skip auto-learning should not be forced into > Bayes as ham simply because some 3rd party promises, for their own > monetary benefit, that the sender is a nice guy. Why should any sender > that I have not intentionally added to my local whitelist get a break? If you _want_ the mail and whitelist the sender, I think its characteristics should be pushed into the bayes. If you don't want the mail, then autolearning it as spam is least of your problems. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux IS user friendly, it's just selective who its friends are...
