On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 23:20 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it
> >> works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, and I
> >> wondered if I was doing something wrong.
> >
> > Yes, UCEPROTECT seems to be just a big sc
On Nov 26, 2009, at 15:12, Allen Chen
wrote:
which free RBLs you guys are still using.
Zen is the only one I use.
Mariusz Kruk wrote:
> Alex pisze:
>> I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it
>> works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, and I
>> wondered if I was doing something wrong.
>
> Yes, UCEPROTECT seems to be just a big scam.
A scam?? You'll have
Hi, all
I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year.
It's still running and filtering spam without any problems.
But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4.
So I am asking which free RBLs you guys are still using.
Thank you,
Allen
Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it
> works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, and I
> wondered if I was doing something wrong.
Don't use UCEPROTECT for catching, only for scoring.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
I could find your IP (82.113.106.21) on these lists :
b.barracudacentral.org 127.0.0.2
bl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2
blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
82.113.106.21.misc.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 127.0.0.9
blocked.secnap.net 127.0.0.2
cbl.abuseat.org 127.0.0.2
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net 127.0
On 26-Nov-2009, at 09:18, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> thus LuKreme spake:
>> On 26-Nov-2009, at 07:55, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>>> Currently I am bombed by more then 100 Twitter messages per day and
>>> whenever I send a complaint to I get a message
>>> from Google back:
>> What sort of messages from
thus LuKreme spake:
On 26-Nov-2009, at 07:55, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Currently I am bombed by more then 100 Twitter messages per day and
whenever I send a complaint to I get a message
from Google back:
What sort of messages from twitter?
Obviously status mails of any kind, e.g. 'x sent y
On 26-Nov-2009, at 07:55, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Currently I am bombed by more then 100 Twitter messages per day and
> whenever I send a complaint to I get a message
> from Google back:
What sort of messages from twitter?
--
'Do you know what they call a sausage-in-a-bun in Quirm?'
'No?' s
Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
Hi Rick,
Thanks for your answer.
So for these cases as could do to work whitelists?
It can be solution in spamassassin or simscan?
>
> Hello,
>
> When more than one recipient for an email is received simscan uses the
> default user when passing to spamd. So i
Hello,
Currently I am bombed by more then 100 Twitter messages per day and
whenever I send a complaint to I get a message
from Google back:
[ STDIN ]---
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:30:36 +
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
To: tamay.do
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
>> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
>> >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
>> >>
>> >> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote:
> >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP
> >>
> >> Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfaction :-)
> >>
> >> Alex
> >
> > NO NO NO NO NO
Is there a way to limit the pattern size in rules created by
seek-phrases-in-log ?
I'd like to avoid creating rules using patterns with +200 characters.
hints very appreciated.
Axb
14 matches
Mail list logo
