Re: Problem with "new_from_string" via package "Mail::SPF::Mech::All"

2009-09-06 Thread Steven W. Orr
On 09/06/09 08:41, quoth Benny Pedersen: > On Sun 06 Sep 2009 04:38:12 AM CEST, "Steven W. Orr" wrote > >> Should I worry? Is there anything I should do? > > http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF/ > > 2.006 have being stable nearly a year now, if after upgrade there is > still problem show it her

RE: antispam comparison by virus bulletin

2009-09-06 Thread Michael Hutchinson
> -Original Message- > From: mouss [mailto:mo...@ml.netoyen.net] > Sent: Monday, 7 September 2009 9:59 a.m. > To: Justin Mason > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: antispam comparison by virus bulletin > > Justin Mason a écrit : > > In fairness, they got in touch to ask for h

Re: antispam comparison by virus bulletin

2009-09-06 Thread mouss
Justin Mason a écrit : > In fairness, they got in touch to ask for help in setting up a more > recent SA, but none of us (ie the PMC) had the spare cycles to help > out. Comparative third-party tests like this always take a lot of > hand-holding. We don't have the same kind of marketing budget as

Re: blacklisting a forger

2009-09-06 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On söndagen den 2 augusti 2009, RW wrote: > On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 21:34:04 -0400 > > "Terry Carmen" wrote: > > > Of course it's blacklisted, but would you care to explain how > > > rejecting mail from 59.184.51.13 helps, when the backscatter > > > doesn't come from there? > > > > According to the OP,

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-06 Thread mouss
LuKreme a écrit : > On 3-Sep-2009, at 15:33, mouss wrote: >> check_helo_hostname_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_host > > If but this in my smtpd_helo_restrictions (with a warn_if_reject for > right now), but where in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions do you > recommend putting this? > >>

Re: Problem with "new_from_string" via package "Mail::SPF::Mech::All"

2009-09-06 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Sun 06 Sep 2009 04:38:12 AM CEST, "Steven W. Orr" wrote Should I worry? Is there anything I should do? http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF/ 2.006 have being stable nearly a year now, if after upgrade there is still problem show it here or to the rpm maintainers -- xpoint

Re: sa-update: rules: failed to run __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS

2009-09-06 Thread Mark Martinec
On Sunday September 6 2009 11:03:23 jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Help, sa-update gives: > > rules: failed to run __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS test, skipping: > (Can't locate object method "received_within_months" via package > "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 755) line 19. ) > channel: lint ch

sa-update: rules: failed to run __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS

2009-09-06 Thread jidanni
Help, sa-update gives: rules: failed to run __RCVD_IN_2WEEKS test, skipping: (Can't locate object method "received_within_months" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 755) line 19. ) channel: lint check of update failed, channel failed