Hi
I was measuring how quickly could SA [spam assassin] process spams when
several SA processes are run in parallel over separate mbox files. I used a
8 core machine. Below are the numbers when I forked different number of
processes.
Fork = 8;
Rate = 57 msgs/sec
Fork = 4;
Rate = 44 msgs/sec
Fo
On Jul 30, 2009, at 18:12, "Dennis B. Hopp" wrote:
Yeah I knew that. I have a few negative scoring rules but not many
(outside of what might be in the misc rules sets I have). What is a
good threshold for ham then?
5.0 is the score SA us designed for. It's a very good number in almost
a
Hi,
>> check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility
>> (/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line
> How's this a SA question?
Yes, my apologies. I don't know enough about amavis yet, and thought
it may be related to all the modules I upgraded, and not amavis
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:07 PM, John Rudd wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 17:54, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, ktn wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the
>>> traffic
>>> of the whole mailing list.
>>>
>>
>> This list generat
Could we please schedule a desired date to release the next pre-release
of 3.3.0? Time based releases help us to stay on track.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
Hello
Before I begin with my questions, here is a description of my setup: I
am using the latest version of SpamAssassin (3.2.5). My perl version
is perl-5.8.3-32.9 - the distribution (Suse 9.1) is rather old, most
of the packages I actually use are self-compiled. I use getmail 4.9.1
to fetch the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 17:54, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, ktn wrote:
>>
>> Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
>> of the whole mailing list.
>>
>
> This list generates less than 50 messages per day on average:
>
> http://gmane.or
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 19:12 -0500, Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
> Quoting RW :
>
> > Bear in mind that autolearning uses it's own version of the score that
> > excludes whitelisting and Bayes, which means that very little ham will
> > reach the -1 threshold unless you've added your own site-specific rule
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:50 -0500, Bryan Haase wrote:
> I am currently using the header_rewrite for the subject. Wondering if
> it is possible to use header_rewrite to change the To: field to a
> sub-domain?
Nope. Which part of the docs [1] isn't clear? See rewrite_header, first
item in the Basic
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, ktn wrote:
>
> Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
> of the whole mailing list.
>
This list generates less than 50 messages per day on average:
http://gmane.org/plot-rate.php/plot.png?group=gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.g
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Bryan Haase wrote:
> I am currently using the header_rewrite for the subject. Wondering if it is
> possible to use header_rewrite to change the To: field to a sub-domain?
>
>
>
> Example
> Mail comes in for u...@domain.com
>
> Spamassassin flags message as Spam, rewrites
Quoting RW :
Bear in mind that autolearning uses it's own version of the score that
excludes whitelisting and Bayes, which means that very little ham will
reach the -1 threshold unless you've added your own site-specific rules
for identifying it.
Yeah I knew that. I have a few negative scor
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:28:49 -0500
"Dennis B. Hopp" wrote:
> I'm using maia-mailguard with spamassassin 3.2.5. For the most part
> it seems to be working ok but I feel like too many messages are
> hitting BAYES_00 (roughly 3.7% of all messages)
3.7% of all messages sounds far too *low*, mo
Gidday Peter,
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with
> this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and
> this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
It's a bit like that when you're using Mailing lists, just another
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
Received: from alside.com (localhost [220.231.127.15] (may be forged))
by alita.karotte.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with SMTP id n6UBn1BJ021997
for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:49:05 +0200
That nonsense should be worth a point:
header R
On Jul 30, 2009, at 3:01 PM, ktn wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle
the traffic of the whole mailing list.
I dunno, I looked at Nabble once when i was away from my computer and
wanted to see quickly if there was a reply to a thread. The only word
that
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 14:01, ktn wrote:
>
> Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
> of the whole mailing list.
If you're an RSS reader, I'd suggest getting an RSS feed from gmane.
You can pick 4 types of feed:
1) full articles, 1 article per email
2) full
I am currently using the header_rewrite for the subject. Wondering if it is
possible to use header_rewrite to change the To: field to a sub-domain?
Example
Mail comes in for u...@domain.com
Spamassassin flags message as Spam, rewrites the subject to include ***SPAM***
then rewrites
On Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:01 PM -0700 ktn
wrote:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the
traffic of the whole mailing list.
Or you could use a news reader pointed at Gmane's news server and subscribe
to the SA newsgroups. A web interface is available here:
Actually I think Nabble is great for those of us who can't handle the traffic
of the whole mailing list.
And I wonder, what has REALLY gotten better since the '80s? Google, cell
phones, and Priuses is all I can think of off the top of my head.
Powershell seems like Bash finally invented for Win
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:28 -0500, Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
> I'm using maia-mailguard with spamassassin 3.2.5. For the most part
> it seems to be working ok but I feel like too many messages are
> hitting BAYES_00 (roughly 3.7% of all messages) and BAYES_99 is only
> hitting about 1.7%. I hav
I'm using maia-mailguard with spamassassin 3.2.5. For the most part
it seems to be working ok but I feel like too many messages are
hitting BAYES_00 (roughly 3.7% of all messages) and BAYES_99 is only
hitting about 1.7%. I have bayes autolearn on with ham being learned
at -1.0 and spam le
[sebast...@alita:~]$ host 220.231.127.15
15.127.231.220.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer localhost.
this is your dns error, it does not make sense
You are correct, but the problem is not in Sebastian's DNS - it is in
the rDNS of the IP that contacted his MTA.
Not quite the same thing, bu
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 14:36 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I recently upgraded perl from 5.6.0 to perl-5.10.0, along with all the
> modules necessary for sa-3.2.5 and amavisd-new (an old version still).
> I'm now having a problem that I really don't understand:
>
> Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (017
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:41, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* Benny Pedersen [2009-07-30 17:37]:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing somethin
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, MySQL Student wrote:
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) TROUBLE in
check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility
(/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line
4019.
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) PRESERVING
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:46 +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * Matus UHLAR - fantomas [2009-07-30 16:35]:
> > On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> > > I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
> > > reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:41, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * Benny Pedersen [2009-07-30 17:37]:
>>
>> On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
>> >> > the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
>> >> > localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:39 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> > Processing locally generated email that contain spam URLs through
> > SpamAssassin is not a particularly good idea. If you have Bayes
> > enabled then you are training your Bayes that spam URLs and
Hi,
I recently upgraded perl from 5.6.0 to perl-5.10.0, along with all the
modules necessary for sa-3.2.5 and amavisd-new (an old version still).
I'm now having a problem that I really don't understand:
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) TROUBLE in
check_mail: decoding2-get-file-ty
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Sebastian Wiesinger
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:48:09 +0200
* John Hardin [2009-07-30 17:39]:
>> Sendmail -> Procmail -> SA (spamc)
>
> Cool, that should be simple.
>
> Can you send:
>
> (1) the Received: headers from an email gen
From: Sebastian Wiesinger
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:48:09 +0200
* John Hardin [2009-07-30 17:39]:
>> Sendmail -> Procmail -> SA (spamc)
>
> Cool, that should be simple.
>
> Can you send:
>
> (1) the Received: headers from an email generated on that box, and
>
* John Hardin [2009-07-30 17:39]:
>> Sendmail -> Procmail -> SA (spamc)
>
> Cool, that should be simple.
>
> Can you send:
>
> (1) the Received: headers from an email generated on that box, and
>
> (2) the procmail stanza where you call SA?
I could create a procmail rule that excludes local mail
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
non working dns is not a spamassassin bug
How do you get "non-worki
* Benny Pedersen [2009-07-30 17:37]:
>
> On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> >> > the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
> >> > localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
>
> non working dns is not a spamassassin bug
[sebast...@al
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
* John Hardin [2009-07-30 17:24]:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
So how can I whitelist mails which come from the server where my
SpamAssassin is running?
Tell your glue layer that messages originating on that server should n
On Thu, July 30, 2009 17:17, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
>> > the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
>> > localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug?
non working dns is not a spamassassin bug
>> a bug apparently.
> JFYI, I created a bugreport for this:
>
On Thu, July 30, 2009 16:46, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * Matus UHLAR - fantomas [2009-07-30 16:35]:
>> On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
>> > I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
>> > reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
>> >
>> >
* John Hardin [2009-07-30 17:24]:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
>
>> So how can I whitelist mails which come from the server where my
>> SpamAssassin is running?
>
> Tell your glue layer that messages originating on that server should not
> be passed to SA at all.
>
> If yo
You can assing the value of that rule
in /path-spamassassin/local.cf. For example I have it
in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
score SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.2
Regards.
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 17:36 +0530, ganesh payelkar wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>Kindly help me to
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
So how can I whitelist mails which come from the server where my
SpamAssassin is running?
Tell your glue layer that messages originating on that server should not
be passed to SA at all.
If you describe how SA is glued to your MTA we might be
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas [2009-07-30 16:35]:
> On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> > I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
> > reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
> >
> > whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
> >
> >
On Thu, July 30, 2009 14:06, ganesh payelkar wrote:
> Dear All,
thats not very dear
> Kindly help me to disable ALL CAPS option in spamassassin
explain more in detail what CAPS is in spamassassin
--
xpoint
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas [2009-07-30 16:35]:
> On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> > I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
> > reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
> >
> > whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
> >
> >
On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
> reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
>
> the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 reso
Hi, in log file I have this error with SA-3.2.5 and MySQL-5.0.77 (with
amavisd-new, postfix, maia):
Jul 23 11:03:35 mail amavis[6329]: (06329-02-2) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace: at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/MySQL.pm line
492\n\teval {...} called at
/usr/lib/per
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:29 +0530, ganesh payelkar wrote:
As per your instruction i did same setting but it is not
working, Kindly let me know any other setting.
>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Daniel J McDonald
wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 17:49 +0530, ganesh payelkar wrote:
>
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 17:36 +0530, ganesh payelkar wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>Kindly help me to disable ALL CAPS option in spamassassin
I assume you are talking about SUBJ_ALL_CAPS. just add to your local
rules:
score SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0
Your local rules could be in /etc/mail/spamassa
Dear All,
Kindly help me to disable ALL CAPS option in spamassassin
Regards,
Ganesh
Hi,
I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule
whitelist_from_rcvd *...@alita.karotte.org localhost
the attached mail is whitelisted because 220.231.127.15 resolves to
localhost. Am I doing something wrong or is
sounds like a bug in sa-compile; it would probably mean one of the
SOUGHT rules will not fire on its input. minor issue, but annoying.
could you run "sa-compile --debug --keep-tmps", find the output dir,
and post the stdout/stderr output and the /tmp dir to a bug on the
bugzilla? thanks!
--j.
O
51 matches
Mail list logo
