1.3 URICOUNTRY_US Contains a URI hosted in US
1.3 URICOUNTRY_XX Contains a URI hosted in XX
-1.0 URICOUNTRY_DK Contains a URI hosted in DK
1.9 URIBL_SC_SWINOGURI's listed in uribl.swinog.ch.
[URIs: paypal.co.uk]
-0.0 URIBL_WHITE
On Wed, July 8, 2009 06:41, Charles Gregory wrote:
> So the desired test is:
do you have a dual quad core that idles ? :)
> rawbody LOC_09070702 /^Assets of my deceased Client/m
rawbody takes more cpu power then
body LOC09070702 /\bAssets of my deceased Client\b/
why missing /i ?
and why ex
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
I have tried all combinations of:
body LOC_09070701 /^Assets of my deceased Client/
body LOC_09070702 /^Assets of my deceased Client/m
body LOC_09070703 /^Assets of my deceased Client/ms
Thanks very much for the various replies on this, both on and off list.
I'm very grateful and am considering things.
Lee
On Tue, July 7, 2009 23:15, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> Thanks. It was a firewall issue.
with now turns into a html issue on maillist :)
--
xpoint
Thanks. It was a firewall issue.
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:54 PM
To: Rosenbaum, Larry M.
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DCC problems
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Mark Martinec wrote:
It is not the DNS query that is a problem here.
Eddy:
What happens when you run the test using -L (no network tests)? Does it
still take as long?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaho
Eddy,
> I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5 on my academic RHEL server and it works
> well :-)
> I'm also using Net::DNS version: 0.65, amavisd-new 2.6.4, postfix 2.5.6
>
> I'm receiving an email which take too much time to process.
> I have to remove it from my postfix's mail queue
>
> here is part of
On Tue, July 7, 2009 21:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> Where did you get that Thunderbird thing? If you look at the headers you
> see that my message-id is quite similar to yours, containing squirrel.
enable listcommands plugin
i just belived i was alone using squirrelmail :)
--
xpoint
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
I just installed that and it works nicely. However, we're getting off
track a little... My second question was answered with RTFMP, but my
first question about a script that will show me the ending score after
all config files have been read, has not been answered. If an
Hi! Netfriends,
I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5 on my academic RHEL server and it works
well :-)
I'm also using Net::DNS version: 0.65, amavisd-new 2.6.4, postfix 2.5.6
I'm receiving an email which take too much time to process.
I have to remove it from my postfix's mail queue
here is part of
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:57:59 -0400 (EDT)
Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
> > I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
> > a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
>
> What the.? So am I!
>
> I
>
> On Tue, July 7, 2009 19:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>> On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Forgot reply all.
>>> newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
>> I ALWAYS hit that button, and then cut'n'paste the list address from
>> Cc:line to the To: line.
>
> this is bad de
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, again off the subject...is it common practice in this user list to
reply at the bottom of emails, or can I continue to reply at the top?
Common practice on any technical mailing list is to prune the reply to the
relevant bits and insert your te
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
Just for interest sake, I am putting my 'test line' here
Assets of my deceased Client
...just to see if it is my testing method that is broken
The body rule is comparing against a "cleaned up" paragraph where those
lines are joined. Otherwise ins
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
What the.? So am I!
I have tried all combinations of:
b
I just installed that and it works nicely. However, we're getting off
track a little... My second question was answered with RTFMP, but my
first question about a script that will show me the ending score after
all config files have been read, has not been answered. If anyone knows
of any kind
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, July 7, 2009 19:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Reply button replies only to the sending individual.
should be okay
thunderbird can have a plugin to fix this problem ?
The plugin is called "Reply to mailing list". It adds a "Reply list"
button that wor
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2004.0 required=10.0 autolearn=disabled
tests=LOC_SAUSERS_RCVD_WL=-1000,LOC_SAUSERS_TO_WL=-1000,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
> I have tried all combinations of:
> body LOC_0907070
On Tue, July 7, 2009 19:53, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
>>> Forgot reply all.
>> newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
> I ALWAYS hit that button, and then cut'n'paste the list address from
> Cc:line to the To: line.
this is bad design in thu
I also just switched web hosts and went with Dream Host, primarily because
they do allow you to run your own compiled SA installation (you can of
course use theirs if you wish), including bayes, should you chose. You will
have to use one of their "Private Servers", which does cost a little more,
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
I have tried all combinations of:
body LOC_09070701 /^Assets of my deceased Client/
body LOC_09070702 /^Assets of my deceased Client/m
body LOC_09070703 /^Assets of my deceased Client/ms
And NONE of them match the beginning of line!
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
What the.? So am I!
I have tried all combinations of:
body LOC_09070701 /^Assets of my deceased
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log files:
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] no working DCC
serversdcc1.dcc-servers.net dcc2.dcc-servers.net dcc3.dcc-servers.net ... at
64.124.52.232 208.201.249.2
Jul 7 13:22:48 or
Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log files:
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] no working DCC
serversdcc1.dcc-servers.net dcc2.dcc-servers.net dcc3.dcc-servers.net ... at
64.124.52.232 208.201.249.2
Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911
>
> On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
>> Forgot reply all.
>
> newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
>
>
I ALWAYS hit that button, and then cut'n'paste the list address from
Cc:line to the To: line.
Reply button replies only to the sending individual.
At 10:45 AM 7/7/2009, you wrote:
I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set
on the highest (1).
What is "1"?
I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The
terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it
Quoting davidcass :
I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set
on the highest (1).
I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The
terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it
should be expected. I am not
I have a webserver that is managed by an ISP. We have our spam assassin set
on the highest (1).
I am still getting daily spam that has sexual terminology in the header. The
terminology is even spelled correctly. The provider is telling us that it
should be expected. I am not really buying into tha
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:05:53 +0100
Lee wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Following my recent queries on this list, for which I am still
> grateful, I abandoned my ambitions for installing and running SA on
> Windows XP, and decided to take on web hosting which offers SA. (I
> have re-uploaded an old web si
On Tue, July 7, 2009 17:36, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
> Forgot reply all.
newer hit that buttom on maillist please !
--
xpoint
Yep.
The previous paragraph from the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page:
If only one valid score is listed, then that score is always
used for a test.
RTFMP - Read The Fine Man Page :)
--
Bowie
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Forgot reply all.
Ok, when all I have is 1 score, is that used
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:13:17 -0400
"Rosenbaum, Larry M." wrote:
> Has anybody considered revising the Bayes expiration logic? Maybe
> it's just our data that's weird, but the built-in expiration logic
> doesn't seem to work very well for us. Here are my observations:
>
> There's no point in ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/09 03:05, quoth Mark Martinec:
> Steven,
>
>> Jul 6 22:38:08 saturn spamd[32217]: Argument "2.long" isn't \
>> numeric in numeric lt (<) at \
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
>> 1004.
>>
>> Sho
Forgot reply all.
Ok, when all I have is 1 score, is that used for all four scenarios?
Dan Schaefer
Application Developer
Performance Administration Corp.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, can someone explain or send me a link to a *full* explanation
of the 4 different score
Daniel Schaefer wrote:
Also, can someone explain or send me a link to a *full* explanation of
the 4 different scores (local, net, with bayes, with bayes+net)?
It's fairly simple. Here is the description from the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page:
If four valid scores are listed,
Hello,
Following my recent queries on this list, for which I am still grateful,
I abandoned my ambitions for installing and running SA on Windows XP,
and decided to take on web hosting which offers SA. (I have re-uploaded
an old web site essentially for the purpose of getting hosting which
i
Now that I have a SA Daily Summary report for the rule hits, now I'm
looking for a command(s) to run that will show me the end score that
will be applied to a successful hit after reading all cf files and
user_prefs files. For example:
/usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf may contain: score BA
Freelotto.com went on our local blocklist on October 31, 2001. No one
here has ever asked us about not getting mail from that domain.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:33 +0200, Peter Daum wrote:
> Just for clarification:
>
> - I guess, your answer implies that the only way to write a rule where each
>of several tests must match is via such a "meta" rule? (i.e. there is no
>way to write a "regular" rule with multiple tests that m
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:33:12 +0200
Peter Daum wrote:
> - whereas "hidden" tests are only useful for meta rules (when I
> prepend "__" to the name of some other rule, it is not only hidden,
> but also ends up with a score of 0, even if there is some other score
> explicitly assigned)
That's not
Martin Gregorie wrote:
You need double underscores to make a rule invisible.
... oops - I had overlooked on the web page, that this is _2_ underscores
(and was pretty puzzled to discover that w/o assigning a separate score
to each single test they will be ignored ;) - Thanks a lot!
Just for
hello :)
as described in
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/137360
they re-build a rule that ZMIde_HIDDENURL1 could allready match.
__ZMIde_HIDDENURL1 match. but __ZMIde_HIDDENURL2 has to be modified to
detect an url with dot at the end. as non-programmer i remove
'[[:space:]
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 09:43 +0200, Peter Daum wrote:
> Is there a simpler and better way to specify that all tests in a rule
> have to match? (or, just for symmetry, to say that a test should
> not match)?
>
describe RULE Combined tests
header__R1 From=~/something/
header__R2 User-Age
Hi,
I can't imagine that this should not be possible, but couldn't find anything
about this question in the spamassassin docs or elsewhere on the net. I need
a rule that has several single tests that all should return true for the whole
rule to match - something like e.g.:
describe RULE and-comb
Steven,
> Jul 6 22:38:08 saturn spamd[32217]: Argument "2.long" isn't \
> numeric in numeric lt (<) at \
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
> 1004.
>
> Should I be concerned?
>
> 595 > spamassassin -V
> SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
> running on Perl v
46 matches
Mail list logo
