On Tue, June 9, 2009 17:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I have a CentOS 5.3 system with everything installed from the repos and
> my @INC looks exactly the same, so I don't necessarily see a problem
> with the versions here.
problem is that some users of yum, rpm, and friends forget to make
reinstall o
Stefan,
> > It would be simplest to install missing modules in one of the
> > perl-default directories, such as /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/ .
> > Or try adding: use lib "your-directory" at the start of file amavisd.
>
> I added
> use lib '/usr/local/perl/lib';
> to /etc/amavisd.conf and it
Mark Martinec:
> Stefan,
>
>
> amavisd does not modify @INC nor use the 'use lib' pragma/module.
>
> > %ENV:
> > PERL5LIB="/usr/local/perl/lib:/usr/local/perl/lib/arch"
>
> Note that amavisd runs in taint mode, so this will be ignored by perl
> according to its perlrun documentation:
> Wh
> > The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There
> > is no difference in rules, when using sa-update.
> >
> > While it is possible to publish per micro version updates,
> > this is not necessary and thus not used for 3.2.x. They all
> > share the very same rules and updates.
>
Stefan,
> I'm in the progress of setting up a new Server with amavisd-new and
> spamassassin. I like to run the recent versions of this programms, but
> therefore I need some perl modules from cpan (e.g. IP::Country::Fast),
> because they are not in the repository of my distribution (SLES 11).
> T
> From: Karsten Bräckelmann
> The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There
> is no difference in rules, when using sa-update.
>
> While it is possible to publish per micro version updates,
> this is not necessary and thus not used for 3.2.x. They all
> share the very same rul
Hello list,
I'm in the progress of setting up a new Server with amavisd-new and
spamassassin. I like to run the recent versions of this programms, but
therefore I need some perl modules from cpan (e.g. IP::Country::Fast), because
they are not in the repository of my distribution (SLES 11).
The
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, June 8, 2009 14:41, snowweb wrote:
Then I tried again with sa-update and got the following:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update
Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/per
l5/site_perl/5.
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 07:57 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> That is correct. I hope (when I get write access to the repo) to add them
> to the 3.2.5 rules so they will go out via sa-update. Is there any way you
> can upgrade to 3.2.5?
The differences between 3.2.x versions are code fixes. There is n
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> I believe his request for stats is a polite way of disagreeing with your
>>> statement that bots 'often' use Outlook SMTP Auth.
>>
>> OK, to be more accurate: times change, and maybe currently it's not that
>> common to use outlook's (or whate
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I believe his request for stats is a polite way of disagreeing with your
statement that bots 'often' use Outlook SMTP Auth.
OK, to be more accurate: times change, and maybe currently it's not that
common to use outlook's (or whatever's) engine t
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:58 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 04:46 -0700, Stefan Guenther wrote:
> > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > > > Some sw components to be ruled out:
> > > > - this isn't amavisd-new doing it, at least none of the official
> > > > versions;
> > >
>
ktn wrote:
>>> By default, the spamd daemon does not allow user defined rules.
>>> Hostmonster needs to set "allow_user_rules" to 1 in the system
>>> configuration file. I asked about this and that's something that
>>> they will not do.
LuKreme wrote:
> It's a good thing there are other hosting
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 04:46 -0700, Stefan Guenther wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > Some sw components to be ruled out:
> > > - this isn't amavisd-new doing it, at least none of the official
> > > versions;
> >
> > Right, that's definitely something else adding the headers, as has been
>
Martin,
Do you mean not use hostmonster for email hosting at all? To run our own
mail server?
Martin Gregorie-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 07:17 -0700, ktn wrote:
>> I am also starting to get a lot of these ".rtf attachment only with no
>> email
>> body text" spams. Unfortunately, we u
Hi,
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
>> > X-SpamScore: 0
>> > tests= SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
>
>> Some sw components to be ruled out:
>> - this isn't amavisd-new doing it, at least none of the official
>> versions;
>
> Right, that's definitely something else adding the headers, as has bee
See add_header in the docs,
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:42:30AM +0100, Rob Sharp wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> A little while back someone posted an entry one can add to user_prefs to
> cause the SA rule breakdown to be added to
Hi there,
A little while back someone posted an entry one can add to user_prefs to
cause the SA rule breakdown to be added to the headers of all emails.
I'm sure I saved the email somewhere, but cannot find it any more. Would
someone be kind enough to repost it please?
Rob
On Tue, June 9, 2009 09:40, Anshul Chauhan wrote:
> *trusted_networks 10.* for all my networks
> by this it is scanning mails & marking them as non spam which i don't
> want.
you ask for advice on how to get spamassassin malfunction ?
see reports from spamassassin and remove the spam, is imho m
> > On 09.06.09 12:09, Anshul Chauhan wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot all of you for your help.
> > >
> > > Please help with this how can i do this
> > > * smtp-auth mails do not scan for spam at all*
> > >
> > > can somebody please guide me for this.
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Matus UHLAR - fant
no i dont have any problem but because of authenticated outgoing as well as
mail within my domain server is busy all the time with mails in queue so i
just want to disable it for my users in my local network only.
I've specified as
*trusted_networks 10.* for all my networks
by this it is scanning m
On 09.06.09 12:09, Anshul Chauhan wrote:
> Thanks a lot all of you for your help.
>
> Please help with this how can i do this
> * smtp-auth mails do not scan for spam at all*
>
> can somebody please guide me for this.
OK, I'll ask again:
Do you have problems with scanning authenticated outgoing
> On 08.06.09 12:21, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> By authenticated users? So that's no bot spam, and the user spams
> deliberately and consciously...
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 14:01 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
says who? Afaik spamware often uses outlook's SMTP engine, so it's
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
