>
> > 0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from
> dynamic IP
> > address
> > [209.92.22.130 listed in
> dnsbl.sorbs.net]
>
> That would be incorrect. The IP is static, not dynamic.
>
> whois://209.92.22@whois.arin.net
> PaeTec Communication
Jeff Mincy wrote:
>From: "sebast...@debianfan.de"
>Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:56:38 +0200
>
>Hello,
>
>i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail.
>
> This is more of a procmail question, so it doesn't actually belong here.
>
It's related to using SpamAssassin,
sebastian wrote:
> i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail.
>
>
> The header of message
>
> X-Spam-Level: **
>
> I want to sort mails into some different directories.
>
[snip]
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Level: .*\(\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
-^^
You are quoting a
From: "sebast...@debianfan.de"
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:56:38 +0200
Hello,
i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail.
This is more of a procmail question, so it doesn't actually belong here.
The header of message
X-Spam-Level: **
I
Hello,
i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail.
The header of message
X-Spam-Level: **
I want to sort mails into some different directories.
10 or more --> directory 10
9 --> directory 9
and so one
But - nothing happens - the mails are all in the /Maildir/new
Actually, disregard. I see what you are stating.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Duane Hill wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
On 04/04/09 4:22 PM, "RobertH" wrote:
0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
[209.92.22.13
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
On 04/04/09 4:22 PM, "RobertH" wrote:
0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
[209.92.22.130 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
That would be incorrect. The IP is static, not dynamic.
wh
On 04/04/09 4:22 PM, "RobertH" wrote:
> 0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
> address
> [209.92.22.130 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
That would be incorrect. The IP is static, not dynamic.
whois://209.92.22@whois.arin.net
PaeTec C
michael,
i had to reply to this one as i was having a hard time replying to your
email and bottom posting.
here was the scoring on that particular email.
although it isnt really strict "reputation" issue, i found it interesting
that JMF had it whitelisted and Barracuda tells it more like it is..
-Original Message-
From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
Sent: zaterdag 4 april 2009 19:47
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ways to block bouncebacks?
On 4-Apr-2009, at 04:07, Mark wrote:
> > Consider using SRS. I wrote a (now somewhat older) doc about it, at:
> >
> > htt
On 3 Apr 2009, n...@esperi.org.uk stated:
> (Worst *video* of a talk, from the POV of actual videoing, that I've
> ever seen. Almost solid black screen plus encoding artifacts. Focus on
> the screen, ye gods!)
I hasten to point out (a little late) that the talk itself was excellent
and hiliarious,
info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu wrote:
Hi,
Before I try to roll my own, does anyone have a set of rules or a plugin
designed to detect all these webmail account phishes. You know -- the kind
that pretend to be a webmail administrator who informs the user his/her
webmail account is being u
On 4-Apr-2009, at 04:07, Mark wrote:
Consider using SRS. I wrote a (now somewhat older) doc about it, at:
http://srs-socketmap.info/sendmailsrs.htm
But it gives you an idea. There's good C implementations for it, these
days, and it will definitely stop ALL fake bounce, with no FPs.
I've read
On Sat, April 4, 2009 18:04, info-spamassassin-t...@cs.utexas.edu
wrote:
> But at a large university we have an ever-renewing crop of
> naive users.
http://www.clamav.org/ here i have over 1 million sigs now, maybe i
am naive to ?
help get more here http://www.clamav.net/sendvirus/ :-)
http://ww
On 04/04/09 12:00 PM, "Michael Scheidell" wrote:
> one company has a list of 'COI' (supposed to be confirmed opt in). they have
> begun a process (see the wiki) of canceling client who claimed COI but
> obviously didn't.
> that 'reputation' score has more to do with contract ($$) than actual real
Hi,
Before I try to roll my own, does anyone have a set of rules or a plugin
designed to detect all these webmail account phishes. You know -- the kind
that pretend to be a webmail administrator who informs the user his/her
webmail account is being upgraded or has exceeded quota or whatever ..
A
On 04/04/09 11:31 AM, "RobertH" wrote:
>
> greetings...
>
> i am working at re-learning and applying SA fine tuning.
>
> in doing so, i have some across some real life SA scoring anomalies.
>
> it is interesting because one public reputaion service rule offering says to
> score "positive",
which ones? remember, DCC is 'bulk', not spam.
someone could have a BAD DCC reputation (using the commercial reputation
filter) as 99% 'bulk', even if it was 100%, double confirmed, bonded opt in.
some others judge reputation based on customer contracts (they get paid
for it). sometimes legi
greetings...
i am working at re-learning and applying SA fine tuning.
in doing so, i have some across some real life SA scoring anomalies.
it is interesting because one public reputaion service rule offering says to
score "positive", i.e. spammy, spam, or blacklist, and another public
reputatio
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 10:45 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> I'm running Spamassassin on my server because of my cPanel installation
> and have been for ages. It's been working GREAT for blocking spam, and
> I'm happy about that. However, of late, I've been joe-jobbed majorly,
> and I'm receiving
Consider using SRS. I wrote a (now somewhat older) doc about it, at:
http://srs-socketmap.info/sendmailsrs.htm
But it gives you an idea. There's good C implementations for it, these
days, and it will definitely stop ALL fake bounce, with no FPs.
- Mark
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy M
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > How fast are non-SA DNS queries on that box? If they take ten seconds to
> > return an answer, SA is not the culprit.
On 01.04.09 17:53, alexus wrote:
> without dns they are 0.1 - 1.5s, with DNS they are ~7s
by "non-SA DNS" he did not mean
Hi,
I'm running Spamassassin on my server because of my cPanel installation
and have been for ages. It's been working GREAT for blocking spam, and
I'm happy about that. However, of late, I've been joe-jobbed majorly,
and I'm receiving thousands of bounceback messages in probably 20+
differe
23 matches
Mail list logo
