michael,
i had to reply to this one as i was having a hard time replying to your
email and bottom posting.
here was the scoring on that particular email.
although it isnt really strict "reputation" issue, i found it interesting
that JMF had it whitelisted and Barracuda tells it more like it is...
i cant imagine perkel's people want that junk, yet he is a big moy and can
make his own decisions...
maybe it is a boo boo...
anyways...
-1.0 RCVD_IN_JMF_W RBL: Sender listed in JMF-WHITE
[209.92.22.130 listed in
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
1.5 RCVD_IN_BRBL RBL: Received via relay listed in Barracuda RBL
[209.92.22.130 listed in
b.barracudacentral.org]
0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
[209.92.22.130 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
2.1 FS_WEIGHT_LOSS Subject says Weight Loss
0.1 DIET_1 BODY: Lose Weight Spam
0.2 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
area
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
1.5 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
1.5 SAGREY Adds 1.0 to spam from first-time senders
- rh
