RW wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:24:58 -0500
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>
>> Unless, of course, you have a trusted_networks or internal_networks
>> statement in your config.. At that point the auto-guesser is disabled.
>>
>
> I do have trusted_networks set, I didn't realise that private add
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:24:58 -0500
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Unless, of course, you have a trusted_networks or internal_networks
> statement in your config.. At that point the auto-guesser is disabled.
I do have trusted_networks set, I didn't realise that private addresses
would have to be included
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:14 -0700, Savoy, Jim wrote:
The primary MX server is a little wilder though:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 206774 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000
RW wrote:
> I'm having a bit of trouble with Fastmail.fm and my trusted network.
>
> SA takes the first X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted header section as the
> last-hop hand-off, and in this case it's seeing the internal
> transaction from the MX server (mx2.messagingengine.com) to the first
> internal se
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:14 -0700, Savoy, Jim wrote:
>I seem to have the same problem as Ricardo. I feed the same stuff every day
> into Bayes, using sa-learn, but the tagging never changes. Otherwise, SA seems
> to be working perfectly on all other messages, but not with the ones I
> constant
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:12 +, Ray wrote:
>
>> Is there a feature like PostFix's `postconf` to display the currently parsed
>> and
>> calculated config?
>>
>
> That pretty much equals your local.cf, no? The non-default settings,
> similar to postconf -n, t
>>On Sat, 07 Feb 2009, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
>> I have SA working very well for me, but there are still a few cases
of spam
>> that are very persistent, I still get a considerable amount of spam
that SA
>> doesn't catch.
>> However, what is annoying is that no matter how much I feed through
>
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:12 +, Ray wrote:
> Is there a feature like PostFix's `postconf` to display the currently parsed
> and
> calculated config?
That pretty much equals your local.cf, no? The non-default settings,
similar to postconf -n, that is. For the complete picture including all
def
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
>
> [ non-DNS-related stuff snipped ]
>
> Sure, you didn't touch DNS related settings at all, neither did your
> test use DNS. :)
>
> Did you see Justin's reply? SA *exclusively* uses the *first* nameserver
> in resolv.conf. So maybe the DNS server at 80.58.0.33
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
>
>
> Unless its reproduceable, you have little to report :-)
>
> more shots in the dark:
>
> - UDP packets blocked at firewall/IDS/router
> (seen this with Zyxel stuff and older Raptors)
>
> did you mention what OS you're using?
>
> - Net::DNS version?
>
> stumped
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 08:47 -0800, Elsa Andrés wrote:
> O.k. I tried the following:
[ non-DNS-related stuff snipped ]
> But still same results in SA :-?
Sure, you didn't touch DNS related settings at all, neither did your
test use DNS. :)
> The main issue I see is that I can resolve in any prog
On 2/26/2009 6:19 PM, Elsa Andrés wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
[7305] dbg: async: timing: 14.975 X dns:TXT:15.35.17.212.list.dsbl.org.
***
right?
so you see timeouts with list.dsbl.org
take a look at http://dsbl.org/
iirc sa-update should remove it from the config
have you ever updated a
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
>
>
> [7305] dbg: async: timing: 14.975 X dns:TXT:15.35.17.212.list.dsbl.org.
> ***
> right?
>
> so you see timeouts with list.dsbl.org
>
> take a look at http://dsbl.org/
>
> iirc sa-update should remove it from the config
> have you ever updated after setup?
> if n
RobertH-2 wrote:
>
> u since the machine does not do dns, and it is not labeled in the
> hosts
> file, does the machine really know who it is???
>
> usually in /etc/host.conf you will have like
>
> order hosts,bind
>
> if the machine cannot know who it is and resolv itself, it will kinda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> so you see timeouts with list.dsbl.org
>
> take a look at http://dsbl.org/
Cute, the comments are full of link spam. :(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - h
On 2/26/2009 5:10 PM, Elsa Andrés wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
spamassassin -D dns < /home/serv1/test.txt
should do it.
By doing that, I get the same results as the ones I sent in my first e-mail.
I can send the full log, if you need it :-?
[7305] dbg: async: timing: 14.975 X dns
Is there a feature like PostFix's `postconf` to display the currently parsed and
calculated config?
If not, how do I submit a feature request?
Thanks,
RSK
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
>
>
> spamassassin -D dns < /home/serv1/test.txt
>
> should do it.
>
>
By doing that, I get the same results as the ones I sent in my first e-mail.
I can send the full log, if you need it :-?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/dnsbl-checks-t
> Elsa Andrés wrote:
> > I am unable to perform dnsbl checks.
> >
> > Running "spamassassin -D &1 | grep dns | less" I
> > get:
> >
> > ***
> > [7336] dbg: dns: no ipv6
> > [7336] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> > [7336] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.60
> >
> > [7336] dbg: dns: na
On 2/26/2009 4:33 PM, Elsa Andrés wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Try running a msg thru SA in debug mode and see if you're having any DNS
timeouts due to some dead BL or similar.
O.k. but I only know a way to do that and is the one I put on first e-mail
:-)
spamassassin -D &1 | less
Is t
u since the machine does not do dns, and it is not labeled in the hosts
file, does the machine really know who it is???
usually in /etc/host.conf you will have like
order hosts,bind
if the machine cannot know who it is and resolv itself, it will kinda freak
out eh?
and, you can put in ip ad
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
>
> Try running a msg thru SA in debug mode and see if you're having any DNS
> timeouts due to some dead BL or similar.
>
O.k. but I only know a way to do that and is the one I put on first e-mail
:-)
spamassassin -D &1 | less
Is this correct?
--
View this message
RobertH-2 wrote:
>
> since all the other machines are ok, you may want to check and verify this
> specific machine configs
>
> /etc/hosts
>
> /etc/resolv.conf
>
> ethernet speed and duplex on the machine and switchport
>
> if i remember right, there are even settings in SA local.cf to check
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 14:46, RobertH wrote:
> Elsa Andrés
>
> since all the other machines are ok, you may want to check and verify this
> specific machine configs
>
> /etc/hosts
>
> /etc/resolv.conf
>
> ethernet speed and duplex on the machine and switchport
>
> if i remember right, there are e
Elsa Andrés
since all the other machines are ok, you may want to check and verify this
specific machine configs
/etc/hosts
/etc/resolv.conf
ethernet speed and duplex on the machine and switchport
if i remember right, there are even settings in SA local.cf to check re DNS
etc etc...
- rh
On 2/26/2009 3:35 PM, Elsa Andrés wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Not always a good plan when you notice that some blacklists *may* not
give you any positive hits when using openDNS.
As Matt put it, a local caching server doing no forwarding is the ideal.
Having no positive hits when using
I'm having a bit of trouble with Fastmail.fm and my trusted network.
SA takes the first X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted header section as the
last-hop hand-off, and in this case it's seeing the internal
transaction from the MX server (mx2.messagingengine.com) to the first
internal server (compute1.inter
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
>
> Not always a good plan when you notice that some blacklists *may* not
> give you any positive hits when using openDNS.
>
> As Matt put it, a local caching server doing no forwarding is the ideal.
>
Having no positive hits when using opendns is not the same that h
On 2/26/2009 1:51 PM, Martin Hepworth wrote:
2009/2/26 Elsa Andrés :
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
Looks like your ISP's DNS server is very slow.
Well, I am using the same dns server in another machine and just works fine
here, also with SA (3.2.3) and dnslb checks.
Anyway, I tested with another
2009/2/26 Elsa Andrés :
>
>
> Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>>
>>
>> Looks like your ISP's DNS server is very slow.
>>
>>
>
> Well, I am using the same dns server in another machine and just works fine
> here, also with SA (3.2.3) and dnslb checks.
>
> Anyway, I tested with another dns server (opendns ones
Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
>
>
> Looks like your ISP's DNS server is very slow.
>
>
Well, I am using the same dns server in another machine and just works fine
here, also with SA (3.2.3) and dnslb checks.
Anyway, I tested with another dns server (opendns ones) and got the same
result (time out)
We are running exim with spamassassin on our gateways and on exim
paniclog I am seeing this message:
spam acl condition: error reading from spamd socket: Connection timed
out on a regular basis (may be once ever 5-10 mins).
We have the following setting for spamd:
/usr/bin/spamd -d -x
Elsa Andrés wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am unable to perform dnsbl checks.
>
> Running "spamassassin -D &1 | grep dns | less" I
> get:
>
> ***
> [7336] dbg: dns: no ipv6
> [7336] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
> [7336] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.60
>
> [7336] dbg: dns: name server: 80
Hello,
I am unable to perform dnsbl checks.
Running "spamassassin -D &1 | grep dns | less" I
get:
***
[7336] dbg: dns: no ipv6
[7336] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[7336] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.60
[7336] dbg: dns: name server: 80.58.0.33, LocalAddr: 0.0.0.0
[7336] dbg:
"Michael Scheidell" wrote in message
news:c5cb212a.81f45%scheid...@secnap.net...
>> Is there any rulesets or plugins that will let me make a word list
>> that if there are 2 or more of the words in the list I can start to
>> assign a score.
>>
> Yes, use meta rules
>
> Header or body rule, header
35 matches
Mail list logo
