On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:14 -0700, Savoy, Jim wrote:
The primary MX server is a little wilder though:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 206774 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 1515235 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 917146 0 non-token data: ntokens
I hope that's OK (the wide disparity between nham and nspam).
No experience with that bias -- however, my guess is that is not ok.
According to the docs, "about equal" is best. Though it also has been
reported, that 10 times more spam than ham works just fine.
I got the impression that the goal was to have a ratio that roughly
reflected the spam:ham ratio of your raw mail stream. If Jim gets 17 times
more ham than spam, the above would be reasonable.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft.
-- James Allchin, Microsoft VP of Platforms
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
15 days until Albert Einstein's 130th Birthday
