On 26/09/2008 11:44 AM, Todd Adamson wrote:
> So, it basically boils down to my lack of knowledge that dsbl died back
> in June, and was used from within spamassassin. I'll admit it. I didn't
> know about it. My fault.
No problem. We didn't know either. It wasn't causing any problems so
there'
On 26/09/2008 2:03 PM, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> someone noticed and mentioned it on the user list. another person saw
> that and filed a bug. Then one of the developers made the change,
> pushed out the update, and closed the bug. I don't see that there is
> any crisis here that needs to be solved
Chris wrote:
> I've changed the ixhash.cf per Dirk's instructions, the whole error is:
>
> [15617] warn: rules: failed to run CYTME_IXHASH test, skipping:
> [15617] warn: (Can't locate object method "check_ixhash" via package
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1500) line 1450.
> [1561
I've changed the ixhash.cf per Dirk's instructions, the whole error is:
[15617] warn: rules: failed to run CYTME_IXHASH test, skipping:
[15617] warn: (Can't locate object method "check_ixhash" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1500) line 1450.
[15617] warn: )
Realize it's
McDonald, Dan wrote:
> No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - "Why didn't the
> SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better". I for one am impressed
> with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and
> maintain it. But most of them have real jobs, and don't spen
On Fri, September 26, 2008 15:51, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> There will be a new version that caches the hashes, so that will be taken
> care of. Just gimme a few more days
super duper
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
>
> They run a bunch of tests every night, and are notified by nagios if the
> tests fail. lurk on the -dev mail list every now and again and you'll
> see it.
>
>
> --
> Daniel J McDonald,
Thanks Dan
I know some and figured some of the rest.
Yeah, I went to the dsbl website some time back a
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 10:35 -0700, RobertH wrote:
>
> >
> > No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - "Why didn't the
> > SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better". I for one am impressed
> > with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and
> > maintain it. Bu
>
> Visionary people can read messages, many RBL servers have announce lists.
> So go ahead and report of file a bug whenever needed :-)
>
> Bye,
> Raymond.
So what is your point Raymond?
That we are end users should find out every external subsystem call and
document it and search for and get
Hi!
When people design and build a system(s) of any type, there should be checks
and balances designed in that can check and see if sub parts of the systems
(or called by the system(s)) are broken or disappeared or what have you so
that allowances / changes can be made in a quicker, more orderly
>
> No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - "Why didn't the
> SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better". I for one am impressed
> with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and
> maintain it. But most of them have real jobs, and don't spend every
> waking
I think using procmail might be the best solution, giving me more control
without having to go through support at the hosting company.
--- On Fri, 9/26/08, Jake Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some common configurations of Exim are set up such that Exim does
*NOT* use the message as provided by S
I've just successfully sa-updated.
Thanks guys.
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2008 15:05
To: Ned Slider
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.or
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 10:44 -0500, Todd Adamson wrote:
> So, it basically boils down to my lack of knowledge that
> dsbl died back in June, and was used from within
> spamassassin. I'll admit it. I didn't know about it. My fault.
No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - "Why didn't t
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> Kelsey, Theo, can you check and see why your secondaries aren't picking up
> the zone change on updates.spamassassin.org? cheers,
Grrr. I really need to fix this stupid bind package:
Sep 26 11:31:05 eclectic named[29926]: dumping m
So, it basically boils down to my lack of knowledge that
dsbl died back in June, and was used from within
spamassassin. I'll admit it. I didn't know about it. My fault.
Todd
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why hasn't it
been removed from
Some common configurations of Exim are set up such that Exim does
*NOT* use the message as provided by Spamassassin. It gives SA a
*copy* of the message, then puts the SA headers from the copy into the
main message. This has the effect of ignoring any SA-modified headers,
like the subject. Notably,
David Ronis writes:
> Hi,
>
> I follow spamassassin by svn. I just tried updating, and after
> sucessfully updating files in lib/Mail/SpamAssassin and rules/ I get:
>
>
> Fetching external item into 'rulesrc'
> svn: SSL is not supported
>
> Something has changed.
nope; something has changed
I'm using a domain hosting service that uses exim for mail. I have little
control other than through user_prefs file and can't change the local.cf file.
In fact, I can't even find it when I look in /etc.
spamassassin --lint:
[12158] warn: config: could not find site rules directory
check: no l
Hi,
I follow spamassassin by svn. I just tried updating, and after
sucessfully updating files in lib/Mail/SpamAssassin and rules/ I get:
Fetching external item into 'rulesrc'
svn: SSL is not supported
Something has changed.
David
Hi!
If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why hasn't it been
removed from the configuration via sa-update before now? That's one of the
purposes of sa-update.
Yeah ... i would file a complaint with your local sales droid. ;)
I guess since nobody bothered to open a ticket befo
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, slaterm61 wrote:
Each users spam preferences are stored in a mysql table and everything
is working pretty well, except that people with the "required_score"
option set to a high level.. e.g 99 are still having spam filtered with
the option in .procmailrc * ^X-Spam-Level: \
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 09:38 -0500, Todd Adamson wrote:
> If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why
> hasn't it been removed from the configuration via sa-update
> before now? That's one of the purposes of sa-update.
Because nobody complained about it and opened a bug.
It was rem
If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why
hasn't it been removed from the configuration via sa-update
before now? That's one of the purposes of sa-update.
Todd
ram wrote:
dsbl has been down for a long long time now
Any more DNS checks is just waste of time
On Thu, 2008-0
Ned Slider writes:
> Looks like something has gone awry then as I successfully updated this
> morning (to 699147, see below), but as you say it's now reporting
> version 694708:
>
> [4349] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org
> [4349] dbg: channel: update directory
> /var/
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:31:45 +0200 (CEST)
> Von: "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Important info for iXhash users
>
> On Thu, September 25, 2008 23:48, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> > Important news for al
Hey,
just out of curiosity i'd like to try what actually happens if you enter your
email address on some spam site that claims to send you money if you give them
your address. (do you receive a virus? a fake bank account? nothing?)
is there any public service which examines these sites?
--
bes
How do you call SpamAssasin?
I ask because some integration tools make their own markups, and only
use SA to generate a list of hits. In those tools, it doesn't matter
what you set rewrite_header to, SA will ignore you.
Have you tried rewrite_header at the local.cf level?
Have you run spamassass
Randal, Phil wrote:
Updates are still at version 694708 for 3.2.5.
Cheers,
Phil
Looks like something has gone awry then as I successfully updated this
morning (to 699147, see below), but as you say it's now reporting
version 694708:
[4349] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamass
Typo in your example config:
bodyCTYME_IXHASH eval:ixhashtest('ctyme.ixhash.net')
describeCYTME_IXHASH iXhash found @ ctyme.ixhash.net
tflags CYTME_IXHASH net
# adjust score as you seem fit
score CYTME_IXHASH 0.1
CTYME and CYTME, oops.
Phil
--
Phil Randal
On Thu, September 25, 2008 23:48, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> Important news for all users of the iXhash plugin and the corresponding
> lists.
thanks for good plugin first, i like to know if it can be speed optimized
more then it is now, problem from the source code as i see it is that if
one use more
Updates are still at version 694708 for 3.2.5.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2008 02:25
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: dsbl.org d
dsbl has been down for a long long time now
Any more DNS checks is just waste of time
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 11:41 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Todd Adamson wrote:
> > Would I be correct or incorrect that this will get updated
> > to our rules through sa-update. If this does get corrected,
> >
33 matches
Mail list logo
