On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 10:44 -0500, Todd Adamson wrote: > So, it basically boils down to my lack of knowledge that > dsbl died back in June, and was used from within > spamassassin. I'll admit it. I didn't know about it. My fault.
No, it boils down to the attitude in your e-mail - "Why didn't the SpamAssassin benefactors do their job better". I for one am impressed with their willingness to provide such a useful piece of software, and maintain it. But most of them have real jobs, and don't spend every waking moment trolling the webpages of obscure rbl'slooking for notices that things are borked. > Todd > > Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> If dsbl has been down for awhile, since around June, why hasn't it > >> been removed from the configuration via sa-update before now? That's > >> one of the purposes of sa-update. > > > > Yeah ... i would file a complaint with your local sales droid. ;) > > > > I guess since nobody bothered to open a ticket before? > > You could have asked before... > > > > Bye, > > Raymond. > > > -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
