Couple of things:
SA:
Closest thing I have found to this has been a plugin/ruleset called
shortcircuit which causes spamassassin to stop scanning an email if a
particular rule is hit. The rules are configured in the .cf file of short
circuit.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ShortcircuitingRu
I am currently using spamassassin successfully for my primary domain. But
spam appears to not be caught when it comes into the same server through
sendmail as a different domain. For instance, when mail is sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin works good but when mail comes in as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 20:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, and I know perfectly well what BAYES_50 is
> *supposed* to mean for *most* people. This may not be a smart move for
> you, but it works remarkably well for us. False positives (which, to be
> clear, are seldom) ca
Karsten Br?ckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is not a smart move, IMHO. A Bayes score of 0.5 does NOT mean,
> Bayes is 50% certain it's spam. It DOES mean, that Bayes does know
> nothing. Absolutely nothing.
>
> Between BAYES_00 (aka ~100% sure it is ham) and BAYES_99 (aka ~100% sure
> i
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 20:25 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Karsten Br?ckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hmm... Sahil, Nitin -- guys, you are seriously confusing me.
>
> I am perplexed by your confusion, but I will try to help you.
My confusion stems from different, almost random results al
Karsten Br?ckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... Sahil, Nitin -- guys, you are seriously confusing me.
I am perplexed by your confusion, but I will try to help you.
> Sahil, this is just odd. The examples *do* have the HB_SEP blank line. I
> guess your download broke or something, but the
No, you'd use procmail. See either http://www.procmail.org/ or a
procmail mailing list. I have very little knowledge about procmail, but
I know it can do what you're looking for, I just don't know the commands
and configuration on how to make it work for your intended use.
Nicolas Letellier wr
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Continuing with the sa-update
When run sa-update -D, my output has the following excerpt:
[14661] dbg: diag: module not installed: IP:: Country:: Fast (
'require' failed)
[14661] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2:: Client:: Agent (
'require' failed)
[14661] dbg:
Skip wrote:
I'm trying to use sa-update for the first time, but I am getting some
errors. I hope you gurus can help.
I believe the root of my problem is that sa-update is looking for my
*.pre rules in /etc/mail/spamassassin. But my rules are not there.
And I don't see a command line option
Hello Evan,
I use Postfix, directly with spamassassin. So, I must write a script,
called in my master.cf for example?
Regards,
Nicolas
Le Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:25:48 -0700,
Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> In short, not in spamassassin. Anything sent to spamassassin is
> scanned. You c
Brent Clark wrote:
Hi
I recently installed spamassasin on my freebsd test machine. For the
likes of me, I keep getting this message, and I dont know how to fix it.
Aug 6 17:06:43 spamassasin spamd[63534]: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create t
In short, not in spamassassin. Anything sent to spamassassin is scanned.
You could use a procmail filter to bypass spamassassin, but anything
sent to spamassassin is scored. Yes, you can whitelist to give it 100
points or more, but it's still scanned and scored.
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello
Hello.
I would like to know if an option is available in spamassassin. I use
3.2.5 with FreeBSD and Postfix.
By default, spamassassin filers ALL emails.
Is it possible to do not scan certain mails? Or to have a list (txt,
sql) or an option (like whitelist_from) for don't scan (or tag headers).
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 8:15 am, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 August 2008 8:57 am, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > If you are using my sa-addon-stats.pl program, it defaults to
> > > getting information from /var/log/maillog. So the period depends
> > > on when you last rotat
Hmm... Sahil, Nitin -- guys, you are seriously confusing me.
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 12:00 +0530, Nitin Bhadauria wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> yes i did train the sa data by
Nitin, neither of your headers shows *any* BAYES_XX hit. Whatever you
trained doesn't seem to be the user SA runs as.
>> Another angle we used when we saw a similiar issue. Use rate-limit to
>> limit the number of recipients an IP can send to per hour. Use a
>> plugin for Squirrel Mail to limit the number of recipients per message
>> and the number of messages per day. Spammers must send out thousands
>> of mes
Hi
I recently installed spamassasin on my freebsd test machine. For the
likes of me, I keep getting this message, and I dont know how to fix it.
Aug 6 17:06:43 spamassasin spamd[63534]: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp
lockfile
/nonex
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Do all the emails ask users to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I notice
you're using Postfix, so it's worth setting up a quick access map that
intercepts all messages to that address and redirects them to postmaster.
You'll then have to contact those users and ask them to change
Continuing with the sa-update
When run sa-update -D, my output has the following excerpt:
[14661] dbg: diag: module not installed: IP:: Country:: Fast ( 'require'
failed)
[14661] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2:: Client:: Agent ( 'require'
failed)
[14661] dbg: diag: module not installed:
I'm trying to use sa-update for the first time, but I am getting some
errors. I hope you gurus can help.
I believe the root of my problem is that sa-update is looking for my
*.pre rules in /etc/mail/spamassassin. But my rules are not there. And
I don't see a command line option to tell sa-u
Chris wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 8:57 am, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > If you are using my sa-addon-stats.pl program, it defaults to
> > getting information from /var/log/maillog. So the period depends
> > on when you last rotated the log file.
>
> I am, and if I don't have a 'maillog' file
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 3:50 am, Peter Sørensen wrote:
> Hi,
> I have the same problem. Can't make pyzor work.
> Is this a generall issue or just my server not working anymore?
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Peter Sorensen/University of Southern Denmark/mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Looks to be ok
[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
I have the same problem. Can't make pyzor work.
Is this a generall issue or just my server not working anymore?
Regards
Peter Sorensen/University of Southern Denmark/mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jake Maul [ma
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Aug 5, 2008, at 7:32, Nitin Bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Nitin Bhadauria schrieb:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Nitin Bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How is it possible that these kind of mail are not spam tagged my
sapmassassin...
Dominic Germain writes:
> replacing "*" by "{0,30}" fixed my problem! The regex works for small
> tables without crashing spamd childs.
Good to hear it.
> IMO, upgrading to Perl 5.10 on OSX is not recommended... Apple is
> tweeking a lot of stuff and there is always chances that a future OSX
25 matches
Mail list logo
