Mail::SpamAssassin 3.2.5 fails: NOT OK

Can't install Mail::SpamAssassin in CPAN... fails at the end... (not whole log, but enough to give context, I hope */usr/bin/perl build/preprocessor -Mconditional -Mvars -DVERSION="3.002005" -DPREFIX="/usr" -DDEF_RULES_DIR="/usr/share/spamassassin" -DLOCAL_RULES_DIR="/etc/mail/spamassassin

Re: Memory Leak?

How recent is the "mdworker" daemon to the Apple OS architecture? It is clearly taking a sizable chunk of memory. And if it manages to drive spamd into swapping you're toast for throughput. If the indexing is not absolutely needed kill it and tell the system not to start it, ever. Then see how th

Re: 0 points

On Saturday 26 July 2008 14:47:21 Jeff Chan wrote: > segelclub-honau.de is a cracked site hosting malware. It's > blackliste on SURBLs now, so it would score. i know. but it doesn't. other mails score fine on uribl and surbl, but this doesn't. I have no clue where to start debugging, since any

Re: junkfiles-bays_toks.expire\d{4-5}

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:35 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > Jul 25 15:28:21 Ishtar spamd[2355]: bayes: expire_old_tokens: child > processing > timeout at /usr/bin/spamd line 1085, line 22. Your autoexpire is taking longer than SA is willing to wait. This is a fairly common question, there's lots

Re: Memory Leak?

Thanks, Kai, for you great comments. Ron Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Having an email problem is painful, but character-building." On Jul 26, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Finally: figures :-) These figures do not indicate any problems. That "inactive memory" is - according to the expl

Re: 0 points

Arvid Ephraim Picciani schrieb: hi, anyone got a clue why i get 0 points here? The domain is listed on uribl black and yes i can look it up manually from the host. Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -

Re: Sa-update

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Eduardo Júnior wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> I have just done an update in the rules of my spamassassin with sa-update >> >> He dropped everything to /var/lib/spamassassin/version >> >> He created the directory with several up

Re: 0 points

On Saturday, July 26, 2008, 4:28:23 AM, Arvid Picciani wrote: > hi, > anyone got a clue why i get 0 points here? > The domain is listed on uribl black and yes i can look it up manually from the > host. > Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) > pts rule name descrip

Re: Memory Leak?

Ron Smith wrote on Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:02:02 -0400: > Processes: 61 total, 3 running, 58 sleeping... 342 > threads 20:19:27 > Load Avg: 0.45, 0.99, 1.21CPU usage: 2.80% user, 3.74% sys, > 93.46% idle > SharedLibs: num =2, resident = 34M code, 0 data, 3104K > l

Re: [OT] Odd spammer tactic?

ram wrote: On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:15 +0200, Jonas Eckerman wrote: [snip] I think I still miss the point. How can someone else declare the MX of my domain. ( dns poisoning ignored ). If that were possible , he would be getting my mails which is much more a serious issue - I buy a domain, sa

Re: 0 points

On Saturday 26 July 2008 13:28:23 Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: err ignore the weird received headers. it was resent by multiple people internaly. -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards Arvid Ephraim Picciani

0 points

hi, anyone got a clue why i get 0 points here? The domain is listed on uribl black and yes i can look it up manually from the host. Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description --

Re: junkfiles-bays_toks.expire\d{4-5}

Matt Kettler wrote: What version are you running? reading around the child processing timeout seems to have been a common problem in the 3.1.x series, but I've not seen it reported in the 3.2.x series. --- Erp. I'll try upgrading and see what happens...still have a 3.1.7 installed.

Re: [OT] Odd spammer tactic?

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:15 +0200, Jonas Eckerman wrote: > Michelle Konzack wrote: > > >> in short, if someone declares you as their MX (without your > >> authorization), you should not start listing clients that try to send > >> mail to such domains. > > > Are there ANY leagal reasons to decl

Re: Memory Leak?

- Original Message - From: "Ron Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, 2008, July 25 18:02 Processes: 61 total, 3 running, 58 sleeping... 342 threads 20:19:27 Load Avg: 0.45, 0.99, 1.21CPU usage: 2.80% user, 3.74% sys, 93.46% idle SharedLibs: num =2, resid

Re: Memory Leak?

What parameters do you use to start spamd? "Nevermind" you just told us. It might help if you used the > and < keys in top to sort by %MEM. These are my top few lines here on a 1 gigabyte machine: 11653 root 20 0 67024 58m 2884 S 0.0 5.7 0:26.75 spamd 19970 named 20 0 88584