David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Download succeeded but this failed.
(mind the wrapping below)
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified?highlight=%28
update%29
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, June 14, 2008 20:55, David Baron wrote:
> Download succeeded but this failed.
>
> Fix?
what ?
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Download succeeded but this failed.
Fix?
I've found that SA works well by default, except that I'm really
intolerant of any spam in my inbox, so I use thresholds that others
consider unreasonably low. I retrain on all spam and all ham daily
(moving uncaught spam to a spam.manual group, letting correctly-tagged
spam stay in spam groups, a
Ms.Engineer wrote:
I just setup a server 2 days ago and had one active domain running in
it.
I still get tons of spams, the hit rate was well below 10%. Out of
every 10 spams, less than 1 was tagged in average.
My score to tag is 5, 8 to delete
Interesting. It really shouldn't be anywher
At 18:11 13-06-2008, Chris wrote:
I sent a post with the above subject about a week and a half ago and Justin
Mason stated that its apparently a Razor problem. I sent the same post to the
Razor list and received 'no' replies. I don't doubt Justin at all, however,
with no replies from the Razor li
At 20:34 13-06-2008, Ms.Engineer wrote:
I just setup a server 2 days ago and had one active domain running in it.
I still get tons of spams, the hit rate was well below 10%. Out of
every 10 spams, less than 1 was tagged in average.
My score to tag is 5, 8 to delete
Now I focus my customizatio
Chris wrote:
Jun 13 19:36:28 localhost spamd[3256]: Can't locate Log/Agent.pm in @INC (@INC
You could try to find out wich module tries to use Log::Simple.
For example doing this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lib/perl5$ grep -r 'Log::Agent' *
I find that on this system, Log::Agent is optiona
