On Thursday 12 June 2008 2:16 am, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 11.06.08 21:11, Chris wrote:
> > If I do not control any mail servers is it necessary for the trusted
> > networks line to be set in my local.cf? If so, what addresses would I
> > enter there? I'm asking this because of this line
About a year ago, I started this thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200708.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
I kind of forgot about the issue, but it's cropping up again; we're
now on 3.2.4, and still having the problem. New logs:
Jun 12 08:04:02 vostok spamd[1299]: spam
Hi John,
At 13:07 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote:
That's not the "what" that you're measuring with the probability
factor, that's the "how" you're measuring it.
Right. It's been a long day. I'll refrain from elaborating or else
I'll say another blunder. :-)
Was the OP _not_ talking about "t
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, SM wrote:
At 10:22 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote:
Probability of what, exactly?
It can be a probability based on historical data of the sender or an
arbitrary score.
That's not the "what" that you're measuring with the probability factor,
that's the "how" you're measu
At 10:22 12-06-2008, John Hardin wrote:
Probability of what, exactly?
It can be a probability based on historical data of the sender or an
arbitrary score.
Bear in mind, "trusted" means "does not forge Received: headers",
not "does not send or relay spam".
My answer was more about levels
Dave Koontz wrote:
All, I never heard of mailchannels.com until it was a discussion here a few
weeks ago. Now, auto-magically I get a "feedback" for free coffee offer?
Interesting... a supposed anti-spam company gleaning addresses from an
anti-spam list to spam them. What ever others though
What is the best combinations of SA plugins that can work together and gives
near perfect results?
Linda Walsh wrote:
Matthias Leisi wrote:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce
the number of DNS lo
I am using spamassassin as a spam filtering tool with
sendmail. Spamassassin is filtering at MDA level with procmail. No other
filtering or scaning tool attached with sendmail or at any other level.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hi Chris,
Am 2008-06-10 13:43:07, schrieb Chris Hoogendyk:
hmm. Didn't notice "upbrade" rather than "upgrade" until I was actually
replying. ;-)
:-) Now I had to look into me German->English dictionary...
Hmmm, maks no snese... "brad" is a "Drahtstift" bu
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You may put other servers, not under your control, to trusted_networks,
if you trust them not to originate spam.
^
Matus, I believe that assertion is incorrect...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, SM wrote:
At 17:46 11-06-2008, Linda Walsh wrote:
How does one decided on 'trust'? I.e. I think it would be
useful to assign a probability to "Trust" at the least. I mean do I put
my ISP in my trusted server list? -- suppose they start partnering with
It could be
Rob McEwen schrieb:
http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/05/spamcop-bl-another-look-its-accurate.html
Therefore, when you said, "too many false positives", are you referring
to FPs from *before* that transformation of SpamCop? Or, are these
*recent* FPs, spotted after that transformation?
It's twofol
Hi Chris,
Am 2008-06-10 13:43:07, schrieb Chris Hoogendyk:
> hmm. Didn't notice "upbrade" rather than "upgrade" until I was actually
> replying. ;-)
:-) Now I had to look into me German->English dictionary...
Hmmm, maks no snese... "brad" is a "Drahtstift" but then a Reverse-
Lookup give
My guess is that your assertion that DNS is working is false.
:)
What does "dig 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org ANY" return for you? Ought to
be a TXT record and then numerous NS records for spamassassin.org.
Perhaps your resolv.conf has multiple nameservers and the first one is having
issues?
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Be careful with using the Spamcop blacklist to reject messages -- while it
is perfectly fine as a blacklist to use in a scoring scheme such as
SpamAssassin, I found it to have too many false positives to use it for
outright blocking.
If you use it for blocking, then you sho
I could be wrong, but I don't believe X-Scaninfo: is a spam assassin header.
What else other than spam assassin do you have?
nitin joshi wrote:
Dear all
i am using spamassassin 3.2.4 and integrated it
with procmail but some of my mails are not scanning properly. It
ta
What is the best combinations of SA plugins that can work together and
gives near perfect results?
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.5 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi
The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future.
md5sum of archive files:
695f9107b240383e48df8938f
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:06:37AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > It seems that many Out of office messages are being catched as
> > VBOUNCE_MESSAGE (virus bounces). Is that designed to be like that?
> >
> > I have no objections for catching out-of-office messages by VBounce ruleset,
>
Dave Koontz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All, I never heard of mailchannels.com until it was a discussion here a
few weeks ago. Now, auto-magically I get a "feedback" for free coffee
offer?
I got one too, but I wasn't sure it was connected to this list.
We had heard from Mailchannels a year o
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 at 10:54 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi,
just 10 minutes ago i received a false positive. First i was confused then i
figured that my SA setup didn't actually flag it, but the senders SA.
So, how could i tell SA to remove any X-Spam flags in case the mail has been
Linda Walsh schrieb am 12.06.2008 02:46:
1) This advice:
| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
How does one decided on 'trust'?
For trusted_network in SpamAssassin, the definiti
On 6/7/08 at 3:19 PM -0500 Larry Nedry wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>A few days ago whitelist_auth and whitelist_from_dkim stopped working.
>Everything else seems to be working well. I haven't made any changes to
>the server recently so I find this puzzling.
>
>neither of these rules work:
>whitelist_fro
Henrik K writes:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:06:37AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems that many Out of office messages are being catched as
> > VBOUNCE_MESSAGE (virus bounces). Is that designed to be like that?
> >
> > I have no objections for catching out-of-off
Dear all
i am using spamassassin 3.2.4 and integrated it with
procmail but some of my mails are not scanning properly. It tagging
mails with Possible spam even some of mails are local internal mails.
In header i found
X-Scaninfo: Scanning. Scanning ...
Sub
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:06:37AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that many Out of office messages are being catched as
> VBOUNCE_MESSAGE (virus bounces). Is that designed to be like that?
>
> I have no objections for catching out-of-office messages by VBounce ruleset,
All, I never heard of mailchannels.com until it was a discussion here a few
weeks ago. Now, auto-magically I get a "feedback" for free coffee offer?
Interesting... a supposed anti-spam company gleaning addresses from an
anti-spam list to spam them. What ever others thought of them before, I
kn
Hello,
It seems that many Out of office messages are being catched as
VBOUNCE_MESSAGE (virus bounces). Is that designed to be like that?
I have no objections for catching out-of-office messages by VBounce ruleset,
but shouldn't they be marked as BOUNCE_MESSAGE instead of VBOUNCE_MESSAGE?
The rea
Hi,
just 10 minutes ago i received a false positive. First i was confused then i
figured that my SA setup didn't actually flag it, but the senders SA.
So, how could i tell SA to remove any X-Spam flags in case the mail has been
identified as non spam?
--
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards
Ar
> > Consequently I disabled the checks. Now, using spamhaus.org and spamcop
> > the
> > overload has disappeared.
On 12.06.08 10:16, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Be careful with using the Spamcop blacklist to reject messages -- while it
> is perfectly fine as a blacklist to use in a scoring scheme such
> Consequently I disabled the checks. Now, using spamhaus.org and spamcop
> the
> overload has disappeared.
Be careful with using the Spamcop blacklist to reject messages -- while it
is perfectly fine as a blacklist to use in a scoring scheme such as
SpamAssassin, I found it to have too many fals
> Matthias Leisi wrote:
> >1) This advice:
> >| Tue Jun 10 14:55:36 2008 [72096] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not
> >| configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
> >manually
> >
> >should not be ignored. Setting trusted_networks would slightly reduce
> >the number of DNS l
On 11.06.08 21:11, Chris wrote:
> If I do not control any mail servers is it necessary for the trusted networks
> line to be set in my local.cf? If so, what addresses would I enter there?
> I'm asking this because of this line in the Wiki:
>
> Generally you want trusted_networks set to contain al
34 matches
Mail list logo
