> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:06:37AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > It seems that many Out of office messages are being catched as > > VBOUNCE_MESSAGE (virus bounces). Is that designed to be like that? > > > > I have no objections for catching out-of-office messages by VBounce ruleset, > > but shouldn't they be marked as BOUNCE_MESSAGE instead of VBOUNCE_MESSAGE? > > > > The reason seems to be in: > > > > header __VBOUNCE_AUTOMATIC Subject =~ /\b(automatic reply|AutoReply)\b/ > > > > since I've seen many OOOs contain subject AutoReply or "automatic reply"
On 12.06.08 12:44, Henrik K wrote: > You haven't read all the VBounce messages since few months? It's well known > and just one of the things that could be improved. I've read most of it, but I don't remember all the details. My memory is quite problematic now :( -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Where do you want to go to die?" [Microsoft]
