SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3 traps on ISMN (international standard Music number,
similar to ISBN)
I just got an order confirmation from a music book store with a pretty high
score
Wolfgang Hamann
On Sat, March 29, 2008 02:09, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I send myself a lot of email from my phone. So AWL properly scores
> me well.
and the sender ip with a fuss of /16
> I just got a piece of SPAM which should have scored 12.something that
> got a -6 from the AWL.
ok
> I think that mail from self
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:09:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I think that mail from self to self should be ignored by the AWL.
> (it's harder to forged mail from a regular correspondent, so this
> makes AWL more useful)
If you know the mail is from you, don't waste the resources scanning the
mess
I send myself a lot of email from my phone. So AWL properly scores
me well.
I just got a piece of SPAM which should have scored 12.something that
got a -6 from the AWL.
I think that mail from self to self should be ignored by the AWL.
(it's harder to forged mail from a regular corresponden
Jeff Koch wrote:
Our users are getting inundated with bounce-back, joe-job spam. We
have the Vbounce.pm plugin enabled (v3.2.4) and have a
'whitelist_bounce_relays' with the name of the mailserver in the
local.cf file and the 'failure notices', 'mail delay' and
undeliverables don't seem to b
Why does this hit on the most OBVIOUS messages?
Its almost an oxymoron
How can all these rules get triggered
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_34BODY: 3alpha-pock-4alpha
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_64BODY: 6alpha-pock-4alpha
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_82BODY: 8alpha-pock-2alpha
-2.6 B
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andrew Hearn wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/961075
I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn
this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message
over 5.0?
I have some "stupid HTML tricks" rules for empty tag pairs; adding
Andrew Hearn wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/961075
I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will
learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of
message over 5.0?
thanks!
Andrew
If you learn the message which = 3.5 wouldn't that put the score +5?
On Mar 27, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Dallas Engelken wrote:
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Sorry
for the OT. I've been trying to get in touch with whoever is in
charge of URIBL zonefile mirrors without success.
Is this thing on? Ping me offlist, por favor. I may have just been
pinging the wrong peopl
Andrew Hearn wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/961075
I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will
learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of
message over 5.0?
thanks!
Andrew
pts rule name description
--
--
http://pastebin.ca/961075
I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will learn
this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of message
over 5.0?
thanks!
Andrew
Hi Richard,
At 08:42 27-03-2008, Richard Hole wrote:
I am interested in spam filtering software that I could encourage
either my server or other servers to use. My server currently uses
SpamAssassin and I hope your software
could be easily modified to do what I suggest below. I want to
receive
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:42:24AM +1000, Richard Hole wrote:
>
> When two people communicate via email they would not have to type each
> others code every time they reply as the code should automatically
> appear in the subject field of the new message. If two people are
> communicating, ea
> From: Richard Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:42:24 +1000
> To:
> Subject: SpamAssassin interest and Spam solution
>
> Hi
>
> I am interested in spam filtering software that I could encourage either
> my server or other
On 28.03.08 14:26, peter pilsl wrote:
> Our mailserver is behind a NAT-firewall (port 25 is passed through to
> the internal mailserver) and I ran into the ALL_TRUSTED-problem. I
> looked up the FAQ and set
>
> trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 (which actually gives me a warning that
> 127.0.0.1 i
look at line 55 of the pastebin ;) you can use that URL I believe.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 8
> Femitha Majeed wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Can you please tell me how to unsubscribe to this mailing list. I
> >tried all that they suggested on the website but failed.
On 27.03.08 22:03, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Could you be more specific?
>
> The SpamAssassin lists website
> (http://wiki.apache.org/
On 27.03.08 11:34, NFN Smith wrote:
> I'm currently running spamassassin 3.2.1-1~bpo.1 from the Debian
> etch-backports branch (yes, I know that backports now has 3.2.4
> available, and I'll be upgrading shortly).
Just FYI:
Debian volatile archive has 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 was planned. Unlike backpor
On 27.03.08 17:05, R.Smits wrote:
> Is there something I can do that our company addresses cannot be used
> for sending spam ? Is DKIM an answer ?
yes, another answer is SPF.
> A lot of our users get "delivery failed" messages. So a spammer is
> sending spam with our addresses :-(
>
> A difficul
Hi
I am interested in spam filtering software that I could encourage either
my server or other servers to use. My server currently uses SpamAssassin
and I hope your software could be easily modified to do what I suggest
below. I want to receive my emails reliably without having genuine
emails
On 27.03.08 19:58, ram wrote:
> I personally dont like the traditional spamcop report method of
> forwarding
> Spamcop uses a double confirm method, and to confirm all mails is a
> pain. I will look at how to automate this. I trust spamcop should not
> mind. This is building spamcops database of sp
Thanks for the uribl.com info. We will be contributing to it, it's a great
resource.
Back to the original problem The links are inconsistent. I'll post another.
http://pastebin.com/m6025c7b4
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
>
> why not :-
>
> util_rb_2tld grupogsv.com
>
> as that appears as part of t
peter pilsl wrote:
> Our mailserver is behind a NAT-firewall (port 25 is passed through to
> the internal mailserver) and I ran into the ALL_TRUSTED-problem. I
> looked up the FAQ and set
>
> trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 (which actually gives me a warning that
> 127.0.0.1 is already part of trusted
Our mailserver is behind a NAT-firewall (port 25 is passed through to
the internal mailserver) and I ran into the ALL_TRUSTED-problem. I
looked up the FAQ and set
trusted_networks 127.0.0.1 (which actually gives me a warning that
127.0.0.1 is already part of trusted_networks)
Neverthe
Jeff Koch wrote:
We used to get detailed spam scoring in the email headers but it seems
to have disappeared after installing 3.2.4. Is there some command for
turning the detailed scoring back on. Can someone please tell me what
it is?
look at the add_header command. Since 2.6.0 this has been
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Can you tell us a bit about your setup?
I am no sysadmin. But I will try anyway.
> How do you integrate SA into your mail chain? Procmail?
I am using qmail-ldap and SA is integrated into the mail chain with maildrop.
For that particular mail that w
26 matches
Mail list logo
