How do you set a rule to expire?
Kate
Bob Proulx wrote:
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
What was the rule you added? :)
I just did the brute force thing and looked for an entire phrase from
that message. It really isn't worthy and this will change very
quickly such that any rule I post now
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> What was the rule you added? :)
I just did the brute force thing and looked for an entire phrase from
that message. It really isn't worthy and this will change very
quickly such that any rule I post now won't be interesting to have in
a ruleset in a couple of days. It n
On Feb 24, 2008, at 7:39 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Anyone catching these?
Here's a sample:
http://pastebin.ca/916902
Those have been slipping right through these days. Scores are in the
pastebin post.
Even with a current sa-update and also Justin's (very wonderfully
ap
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> Anyone catching these?
>
> Here's a sample:
>
> http://pastebin.ca/916902
>
> Those have been slipping right through these days. Scores are in the
> pastebin post.
Even with a current sa-update and also Justin's (very wonderfully
appreciated) sought.cf scores I only
Anyone catching these?
Here's a sample:
http://pastebin.ca/916902
Those have been slipping right through these days. Scores are in the
pastebin post.
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.7
(From the Ubuntu package, which I cannot for the life of me figure out
how to e
Which part of the address? [EMAIL PROTECTED] or "-Foo Bar"?
Loren
How does one pattern match email addresses that start with _ or -
Looking through my logs, I can't find a single message sent by a _ or -
thats legit.
-Vlad
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> We've had similar problem. It was caused by our clients who did not SMTP
> authentication and sent mail to our clients, so they were really sending
> mail from outlook express to the destination server (we use the same
> servers
> for primary MX as for outgoing
> Micah Anderson schrieb:
>
> | [surprisingly low scores]
> | The spams can be pulled from here: http://micah.riseup.net/spams
On 24.02.08 02:15, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Most (all?) of the samples are forwarded through some debian.org
> mechanism. In order for blacklists to take full effect, you
On 23.02.08 17:34, giga328 wrote:
> I'm testing SpamAssassin and I'm getting false positives. Both tests
> ALL_TRUSTED and DOS_OE_TO_MX are firing for emails sent by Outlook Express
> for local clients and it seems like I have something wrong in *_networks.
> Here is my setup:
> All my servers and
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:15:24 +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Micah Anderson schrieb:
>
> | [surprisingly low scores]
> | The spams can be pulled from here: http://micah.riseup.net/spams
>
> Most (all?) of the samples are forwarded through some debian.org
> mechanism. In order for blacklists to ta
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:52:01 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> I'm looking for people to have a look over these spams and give me some
>> ideas of some possible areas for improvement (either score adjustments,
>> configuration tweaks, plugins that I should try, etc.).
>>
>> The spams can be pulled fro
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
>
> Please post the full received headers of the problem message and your
> trusted/internal/msa networks config. If you're paranoid about publicly
> posting them you can send them to me directly.
>
> Daryl
>
>
Hi Daryl,
Email system will not use NAT so IP adre
On 18 Feb 2008, Jari Fredriksson told this:
> All it takes is a Unix/Linux user who does not know about smart hosts
Or who doesn't have one because it costs a lot extra and/or because the
smarthost is unreliable (and, no, `just change ISP' doesn't work: in
much of the world one ISP has a quasi-mon
> From: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:54:19 + (UTC)
> To:
> Subject: Low scores
>
>
> I feel like a lot of pretty obvious spams are getting through my system
> with appallingly low scores. I'm starting to wonder if something may be
> wrong with my setup. Loo
15 matches
Mail list logo
